Clinical efficacy of microscopic varicocelectomy versus laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele with male infertility.
- Author:
Yu PAN
1
;
Ling FU
2
;
Xiao-Jing GUO
1
;
Wen-Xin LI
1
;
Lin QIAN
1
;
Lei YU
1
;
Hong-Qiang WANG
1
;
Kai-Shu ZHANG
1
;
Shen-Qian LI
1
;
Qiang LI
1
;
Pei-Tao WANG
1
;
Han-Shu WANG
1
;
Tao JING
1
Author Information
1. Department of Andrology， The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University， Qingdao， Shandong 266000， China.
2. Department of Urology， The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University， Qingdao， Shandong 266000， China.
- Publication Type:English Abstract
- Keywords:
varicocele;
male infertility； microscopic surgery;
laparoscopic surgery;
semen quality； pregnancy rate
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Varicocele/complications*;
Laparoscopy;
Infertility, Male/etiology*;
Retrospective Studies;
Adult;
Microsurgery;
Treatment Outcome;
Pregnancy;
Female
- From:
National Journal of Andrology
2025;31(4):333-337
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical efficacy between microscopic varicocelectomy and laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele（VC）with male infertility.
METHODS:A total of 307 patients who were diagnosed with VC complicated with male infertility and admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from October 2018 to October 2022 were recruited for retrospective analysis. The patients were divided into the microscopic group (180 cases) and laparoscopic group (127 cases) according to the surgery method. The pre- and postoperative clinical data of these two groups were analyzed, including the degree of dilatation and reflux time of internal spermatic vein，hemodynamic parameters of testicular capsular artery，proportion of progressive motility spermatozoa (PR), concentration of spermatozoa, proportion of normal morphology sperm，the pregnancy outcome of spouses and the incidence of complications related with surgery within 2 years postoperatively.
RESULTS:All the surgeries for the 307 patients in this study were successful. There was no significant difference in operation time, hospitalization time and management expenses between the microscopic group and the laparoscopic group (P>0.05). Compared to the patients in laparoscopic group, the patients in the microscopic group received a better improvement in venous diameter, reflux time of spermatic veins and hemodynamic parameters of testicular capsular artery (P<0.05). Moreover, the semen analysis showed that the PR, spermatozoa concentration and proportion of normal morphology sperm in the microscopic group were also obviously increased than those in the laparoscopic group (P<0.05). During the 2-year follow-up period, the conception rate of spouses in the microscopic group was 67.2%, while only 47.2% in the laparoscopic group, in which the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Besides, the time-to-pregnancy ( TTP ) within 2 years postoperatively in the microscopic group was significantly shorter than that in the laparoscopic group（P<0.05). Meanwhile, the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the microscopic group was also significantly lower than that in the laparoscopic group (P<0.05). It is worth mentioned that the spontaneous conception rate of spouses with successful pregnancy in the microscopic group was also significantly higher than that in the laparoscopic group (P<0.05). Severe complication such as testicular atrophy, bleeding and infection did not appear in both of two groups. However, the incidences of testicular hydrocele and recurrence of VC postoperatively in the laparoscopic group were significantly higher than those in the microscopic group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:Both microscopic varicocelectomy and laparoscopic varicocelectomy can be applied to the management of VC combined with male infertility. But microscopic varicocelectomy showed better clinical efficacy in improving the testicular hemodynamic parameters, semen quality, pregnancy outcome and postoperative complications, which is worthy of further clinical applications.
