Phrenic Nerve Cryotherapy for Preventing Prolonged Air Leak During VATS Lobectomy.
10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2025.102.23
- Author:
Qingyu MENG
1
;
Yongkun WU
2
;
Yufei WANG
2
;
Zhanlin GUO
2
Author Information
1. The First Clinical Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010059, China.
2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China.
- Publication Type:English Abstract
- Keywords:
Lung neoplasms;
Phrenic nerve cryotherapy;
Prolonged air leak;
Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
- MeSH:
Humans;
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/adverse effects*;
Male;
Female;
Middle Aged;
Lung Neoplasms/surgery*;
Aged;
Phrenic Nerve/physiopathology*;
Cryotherapy;
Pneumonectomy/adverse effects*;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*;
Adult
- From:
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
2025;28(6):405-414
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is the primary surgical treatment for lung cancer. A significant factor affecting postoperative recovery is prolonged air leak (PAL). Despite numerous clinical strategies could prevent and manage postoperative PAL, its incidence remains high. Phrenic nerve cryotherapy (PNC) temporarily inhibits phrenic nerve function, causing diaphragm elevation, which reduces thoracic cavity volume, enhances pleural apposition, and mitigates air leakage. This study investigates the efficacy of PNC in preventing postoperative PAL during VATS lobectomy.
METHODS:A total of 108 eligible lung cancer patients who underwent surgery at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, from June 2023 to January 2025, were enrolled and randomly assigned to the control group (n=54) and the experimental group (n=54). The patients in both the two groups received VATS lobectomy and systematic lymph node dissection, with the experimental group also undergoing PNC during the operation. The baseline characteristics, intraoperative, postoperative indicators and dynamic changes in air leakage between the two groups were compared.
RESULTS:The baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of pulmonary air leakage at 24 h after surgery (31.5% vs 29.6%) and the incidence of postoperative PAL (20.4% vs 14.8%) showed no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative air leak test to 24 hours after surgery revealed that air leakage ceased in 8 cases (32.0%) in the control group, compared to 14 cases (46.7%) in the experimental group. Moreover, during the progression from air leakage at 24 hours post-surgery to postoperative PAL, air leakage ceased in 6 cases (35.3%) in the control group and 8 cases (50.0%) in the experimental group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Compared to the control group, the patients in the experimental group exhibited more pronounced postoperative diaphragmatic elevation that recovered to a slightly higher than preoperative level by 3 mon after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS:The combination of PNC and active lung repair can serve as an important intervention for patients at high risk of intraoperative air leakage, reducing the occurrence of postoperative PAL.
