Surgical approaches to varicocele: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
- Author:
Lin-Jie LU
1
;
Kai XIONG
1
;
Sheng-Lan YUAN
1
;
Bang-Wei CHE
2
;
Jian-Cheng ZHAI
2
;
Chuan-Chuan WU
1
;
Yang ZHANG
1
;
Hong-Yan ZHANG
3
;
Kai-Fa TANG
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Systematic Review
- Keywords: network meta-analysis; surgery; systemic review; varicocele
- MeSH: Humans; Male; Embolization, Therapeutic/methods*; Microsurgery/methods*; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sclerotherapy/methods*; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods*; Varicocele/surgery*
- From: Asian Journal of Andrology 2025;27(6):728-737
- CountryChina
- Language:English
- Abstract: Surgical methods for varicocele remain controversial. This study intends to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches for treating varicocele through a network meta-analysis (NMA). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were thoroughly searched. In total, 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 24 cohort studies were included, covering 9 different surgical methods. Pairwise meta-analysis and NMA were performed by means of random-effects models, and interventions were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). According to the SUCRA, microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy (MSV; 91.6%), microsurgical retroperitoneal varicocelectomy (MRV; 78.2%), and microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy (MIV; 76.7%) demonstrated the highest effectiveness in reducing postoperative recurrence rates. In this study, sclerotherapy embolization (SE; 87.2%), MSV (77.9%), and MIV (67.7%) showed the best results in lowering the risk of hydrocele occurrence. MIV (82.9%), MSV (75.9%), and coil embolization (CE; 58.7%) were notably effective in increasing sperm motility. Moreover, CE (76.7%), subinguinal approach varicocelectomy (SV; 69.2%), and SE (55.7%) were the most effective in increasing sperm count. SE (82.5%), transabdominal laparoscopic varicocelectomy (TLV; 76.5%), and MRV (52.7%) were superior in shortening the length of hospital stay. The incidence rates of adverse events for MRV (0), SE (3.3%), and MIV (4.1%) were notably low. Cluster analyses indicated that MSV was the most effective in the treatment of varicocele. Based on the existing evidence, MSV may represent the optimal choice for varicocele surgery. However, selecting clinical surgical strategies requires consideration of various factors, including patient needs, surgeon experience, and the learning curve.
