Comparison of two transforaminal endoscopic techniques for recurrent L5S1 lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240747
- Author:
Yue-Hong GUAN
1
;
Jian WU
2
;
Li-Jun WANG
2
;
Bin XU
2
;
Jian TANG
3
;
Ying ZHANG
3
;
Ying-Qi HE
1
Author Information
1. Department of Rehabilitation, the Second People's Hospital of Changshu, Changshu 215500, Jiangsu, China.
2. Department of Spinal Orthopedics, the Second People's Hospital of Changshu, Changshu 215500, Jiangsu, China.
3. Department of Anesthesiology, the Second People's Hospital of Changshu, Changshu 215500, Jiangsu, China.
- Publication Type:English Abstract
- Keywords:
High iliac crest;
Lumbar disc herniation;
Recurrent;
Surgical operation;
Transforaminal endoscopy
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Female;
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery*;
Endoscopy/methods*;
Middle Aged;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*;
Ilium/surgery*;
Adult;
Diskectomy/methods*
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2025;38(11):1100-1105
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore the clinical efficacy of conventional transforaminal endoscopic technique and I See transforaminal endoscopic technique in the treatment of recurrent L5S1 lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest.
METHODS:A total of 36 patients with recurrent L5S1 lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest after posterior small-incision discectomy, admitted from May 2016 to May 2023, were selected. They were divided into the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group and the I See transforaminal endoscopy group according to the different transforaminal endoscopic techniques adopted, and all patients in both groups underwent lateral transforaminal spinal canal decompression and discectomy. There were 18 patients in the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group, including 11 males and 7 females, with an age of (52.24±6.68) years;the I See transforaminal endoscopy group also had 18 patients, including 12 males and 6 females, with an age of (50.75±7.79) years. The perioperative indicators (operation time, number of intraoperative radiographs, and length of hospital stay) were compared between two groups. The clinical efficacy was evaluated using the visual analogue scale(VAS) for pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) low back pain score, and the modified MacNab criteria before and after surgery.
RESULTS:All patients achieved gradeⅠincision healing, with no infection cases. The operation time of the I See group was (64.25±16.67) minutes, which was significantly shorter than that of the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group (89.11±17.24) minutes, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The number of intraoperative radiographs in the I See group was (5.20±2.29) times, which was significantly less than that in the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group(19.16±3.68) times, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The VAS and total JOA scores of both groups at the 3rd day, the 3rd month after surgery, and the last follow-up were significantly lower than those before surgery, with statistically significant differences(P<0.05);however, there were no statistically significant differences in VAS and total JOA scores between two groups at the 3rd day, the 3rd month after surgery, and the last follow-up (P>0.05). According to the modified MacNab criteria for efficacy evaluation:in the conventional transforaminal endoscopy group, 14 cases were excellent and 4 cases were good;in the I See transforaminal endoscopy group, 15 cases were excellent and 3 cases were good;there was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between two groups(Z=0.177, P=0.674).
CONCLUSION:Both transforaminal endoscopic techniques have good clinical effects in the treatment of recurrent L5S1 lumbar disc herniation with high iliac crest, resulting in significant improvement of postoperative symptoms, and they are safe, reliable, and minimally invasive surgical methods. Compared with the conventional transforaminal endoscopy, the I See transforaminal endoscopic technique has shorter operation time and fewer intraoperative radiographs, so it is generally the first choice.
