Tibial transverse transport combined with antibiotic-loaded bone cement for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240194
- Author:
Wen CHEN
1
;
Li TIAN
1
;
Tao LIU
1
;
Zhi-Jun HE
1
;
Yan LI
1
;
Jin-Peng LI
1
Author Information
1. Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Antibiotic-loaded bone cement;
Diabetic foot ulcer;
Tibial transverse transport
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Female;
Aged;
Bone Cements/therapeutic use*;
Middle Aged;
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use*;
Diabetic Foot/therapy*;
Retrospective Studies;
Tibia/surgery*
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2025;38(9):878-883
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare clinical efficacy of tibial transverse transport(TTT) combined with antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ABC) and TTT in treating diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).
METHODS:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 patients with DFU treated from January 2019 to January 2023. They were divided into bone cement group and bone transfer group according to different treatment methods, with 30 patients in each group. There were 20 males and 10 females in bone cement group, aged from 61 to 76 years old with an average of (68.15±4.85) years old;the course of ulcer disease ranged from 7 to 28 months with an average of (15.28±5.52) months;16 patients were grade 3 and 14 patients were grade 4 according to Wagner classification; TTT combined with ABC treatment was performed. There were 22 males and 8 females in bone transfer group, aged from 60 to 75 years old with average of (67.85±4.62) years old;the course of ulcer disease ranged from 6 to 29 months with an average of (14.35±5.21) months;17 patients were grade 3 and 13 patients were grade 4 according to Wagner classification;TTT was performed. The control time of wound infection, duration of antibiotic use, frequency of debridement, weight-bearing time of the affected limb, healing time of ulcer surface and recurrence of infection were compared between two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and ankle brachial index (ABI) between two groups was compared before operation and 2 and 6 months after operation.
RESULTS:Sixty patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months with average of (17.24±4.42) months. The control time of wound infection, duration of antibiotic use, frequency of debridement, weight-bearing time of the affected limb, and healing time of ulcer surface in bone cement group were (11.02±2.14) days, (12.7±3.5) days, (1.2±0.4) times, (90.02±2.75) days, and (2.32±3.45) months, respectively;while in bone transfer groups were (20.14±3.15) days, (20.4±4.5) days, (2.2±0.8) times, (106.64±8.35) days, and (4.53±3.12) months respectively; bone cement group was superior to bone transfer group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Comparisons of VAS and ABI before and after treatment between two groups showed preoperative VAS and ABI in bone cement group were (6.71±0.73) points and (0.25±0.04) respectively, and those in bone transfer group were (6.87±0.17) points and (0.27±0.03) respectively. At 2 months after operation, VAS and ABI in bone cement group were (3.71±0.47) points and (0.61±0.03) respectively, and those in bone transfer group were (3.79±0.70) points and (0.59±0.05) respectively;postoperative VAS and ABI at 6 months in bone cement group were (2.26±0.13) points and (0.80±0.05) respectively, and those in bone transfer group were (2.57±0.17) points and (0.79±0.04) respectively;postoperative VAS and ABI between groups were improved at each time points compared with those of before operation (P<0.05). In bone cement group, there were 2 patients with ulcer recurrence and 1 patient with gangrene;while in bone transfer group, 5 patients with recurrence of infection, 2 patients with recurrence of ulcer and 1 patient with gangrene;the recurrence rate of infection in bone cement group were lower than that in bone transfer group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:The combination of TTT and ABC in treating DFU has a good therapeutic effect, which could be shorten the infection control time, ulcer healing time and antibiotic use time, effectively relieve pain, reduce the recurrence rate of infection and improve the quality of life of patients.
