Comparison of the early and medium term efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined lateral fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230398
- Author:
Ren-Jie LI
1
;
Wei-Min JIANG
1
;
Tang-Yi-Heng CHEN
1
;
Sen YANG
1
;
Yi-Jie LIU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, Dushuhu Hospital, Suzhou, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, China.
- Publication Type:English Abstract
- Keywords:
Internal fixation;
Intervertebral fusion;
Lumbar vertebra;
Minimal invasive;
Oblique lateral interbody fusion;
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Female;
Spinal Stenosis/surgery*;
Spinal Fusion/methods*;
Aged;
Middle Aged;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*;
Retrospective Studies;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2025;38(5):465-472
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion(OLIF) combined with lateral fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
METHODS:Totally 47 patients with lumbar stenosis from November 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively and were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods. Among them, 21 cases underwent oblique lumbar interbody fusion supplemental anterolateral screw and rod instrumentation, including 5 males and 16 females, with a mean age of (68.19±6.13) years old ranging 55 to 74 years; the other 26 cases underwent posterior pedicle screw fixation and reduction were recorded, including 8 males and 18 females with a mean age of (65.35±7.64) years old ranging 54 to 78 years. Visual analogue scale(VAS) of pain was recorded to evaluate the degree of low back pain and lower extremity pain. The radiographic parameters were collected to evaluate the efficacy of two approaches including disc height, foraminal height, canal sagittal diameter and cross-sectional area.
RESULTS:All operations were completed successfully. The wound healed normally and bone fusion was obtained in the last final follow up. No serious complication was occurred in both groups. One case of dural tear occurred in direct compression group. Four cases of left thigh weakness and pain were recorded in indirect decompression group. The average postoperative follow-up was(21.69±4.37)months in direct compression group, while(20.43±4.80)months in another group. There were no significant difference in bone density, body mass index(BMI), hospital stay, Cobb angel(P>0.05). The differences in intra-operative blood loss, operation time, disc height, foraminal height between two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05). The area and sagittal diameter of the spinal canal in the two groups were significantly improved after surgery(P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:Both two fusion methods have achieved good clinical results in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, with the advantages of good stability, fast recovery and high fusion rate. Compared with TLIF, the advantage of OLIF has greater advantages in less bleeding and less trauma.
