Comparison of side-opening and front-opening approach bone cement injectors in percutaneous kyphoplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230284
- Author:
Wei-Xin DONG
1
;
Zhen-Tao CHU
1
;
Yong HU
1
;
Ou-Jie LAI
1
;
Zhen-Shan YUAN
1
;
Xiao-Yang SUN
1
Author Information
1. Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China.
- Publication Type:English Abstract
- Keywords:
Bone cement injector;
Osteoporosis;
Percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP);
Vertebral compression fractures
- MeSH:
Humans;
Female;
Male;
Kyphoplasty/instrumentation*;
Aged;
Bone Cements;
Fractures, Compression/surgery*;
Retrospective Studies;
Spinal Fractures/surgery*;
Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries*;
Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries*;
Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery*;
Middle Aged;
Aged, 80 and over
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2025;38(2):128-133
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare clinical efficacy between side-opening and front-opening bone cement injectors in percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) for the management of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs).
METHODS:A retrospective cohort study was conducted, comprising 62 patients with single-segment thoracolumbar OVCFs (T11-L2), who underwent bilateral PKP at our department during the period from June 2020 to October 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the specific bone cement injector employed during the surgical procedure: the side-opening group (n=29) and the front-opening group (n=33). Among them, the side-opening group consisted of 6 male and 23 female patients, with a mean age of (73.32±9.11) years. The front-opening group included 7 male and 26 female patients, with a mean age of (71.29±10.39) years. The variables encompassed essential patient characteristics were recorded, such as gender, age, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture level (T11-L2), as well as procedural aspects, including operation duration, cement injection volume, cement distribution type (lobular or diffuse), occurrence of cement leakage, pre-and post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, and vertebral compression ratio.
RESULTS:All patients underwent successful surgery, with a mean follow-up duration of (15.37±3.03) months. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, BMD, fracture level, preoperative vertebral compression degree, and VAS scores between the side-opening group and the front-opening group (P>0.05). The operation time, the mean cement injection volumes, the distribution of bone cement within the vertebrae has no statistically significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). Both the side-opening and front-opening groups showed significant improvements in VAS scores at 3 days and 6 months after operation (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at both 3 days and 6 months after the operation (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION:Side-opening bone cement injectors in bilateral PKP surgery for single-segment thoracolumbar OVCF achieve similar clinical efficacy as front-opening injectors, without significant improvement in cement distribution and containment.
