Efficacy and safety of microsurgery in patients with Gustilo ⅢC open fractures.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230382
- Author:
Bing WANG
1
;
Cheng ZHU
1
;
Ping WANG
1
;
Zi-Zheng WU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedics, Fudan University Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital Wusong Hospital, Shanghai 200940, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Gutilo ⅢC open fracture;
Limb function;
Microsurgical techniques
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Female;
Adult;
Fractures, Open/surgery*;
Microsurgery/methods*;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2025;38(1):41-46
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of microsurgery in patients with Gustilo ⅢC open fractures.
METHODS:A total of 64 patients with Gustilo ⅢC open fractures who were admitted to the hospital bewteen September 2018 and March 2022 were included, and divided into the observation group and the control group, with 32 cases in each one. In the observation group, there were 24 males and 8 females, aged from 29 to 42 years with an average of (36.59±3.24) years. The tibial defect ranged from 2 to 5 cm with an average of (3.41±0.61) cm, and the soft tissue defect area ranged from 34 to 76 cm2 with an average of (58.50±9.44) cm2. This group received microsurgical treatment. In the control group, there were 25 males and 7 females, aged from 27 to 44 years with an average of (37.59±3.21) years. The tibial defect ranged from 2 to 6 cm with an average of (3.59±0.80) cm, and the soft tissue defect area ranged from 36 to 78 cm2 with an average of (59.09±9.53) cm2. This group received conventional staged surgery, with plaster or brace fixation after initial debridement and appropriate internal fixation at a later stage. The Anderson scores, motor ability Fugl-Meyer scale, perioperative indicators, rehabilitation outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS:The patients were followed up for a duration from 2.5 to 5.5 months with an average of (3.15±1.11) months. In the observation group, 19 patients were rated as excellent, 12 patients as good, 1 patient as fair, and no patients as poor. In the control group, 11 patients were rated as excellent, 13 patients as good, 6 patients as fair, and 2 patients as poor. The difference in outcomes between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The operation time, the hospitalization time, and the hospitalization cost in the observation group(4.39±0.69) h, (30.22±4.58) d, and (23, 500±3, 300) yuan, respectively were significantly lower than those in the control group(5.01±0.75) h, (33.28±3.74) d, and(30, 200±5, 200) yuan, respectively (P<0.05). Revascularization time(134.25±14.76) h, wound healing time(11.34±1.56) d, and fracture healing time(3.09±0.42) months in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05) which were (189.36±22.17) h, (13.22±2.03) d and (4.02±0.57) months respectively. The motor ability(42.91±5.51) points, sensory function(46.19±3.53) points, and total Fugl-Meyer score(89.09±6.08) in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05) which were(35.19±4.27), (34.03±3.79), (69.22±6.32) points respectivdy. In the observation group, there were 1 case of refractory wound and 3 cases of complete nerve injury, which were lower than those in the control group (8 cases and 10 cases, respectively, P<0.05). The number of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:Microsurgical technique can effectively shorten the wound and fracture healing time in patients with Gustilo Ⅲ C open fracture, improve limb movement ability, and reduce the risk of poor prognosis and complications.
