Preliminary application of human-computer interaction CT imaging AI recognition and positioning technology in the treatment of type C1 distal radius fractures.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240601
- Author:
Yong-Zhong CHENG
1
;
Xiao-Dong YIN
2
;
Fei LIU
2
;
Xin-Heng DENG
3
;
Chao-Lu WANG
4
;
Shu-Ke CUI
5
;
Yong-Yao LI
2
;
Wei YAN
2
Author Information
1. Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China; Nanyang City Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Nanyang 473000, Henan, China.
2. Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China.
3. Nanyang City Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Nanyang 473000, Henan, China.
4. Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China; Nanyang City Traditional Chinese Medicine Orthopedic Biomechanics Key Laboratory, Nanyang 473000, Henan, China.
5. Nanyang City Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Nanyang 473000, Henan, China; ZHANG Zhongjing Prescription Intelligent Development Engineering Technology Research Center of Henan Province, Nanyang 473000, Henan, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
AI-powered geolocation identification;
Computed tomography(CT);
Distal radius fracture;
Human-Computer interaction
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Female;
Radius Fractures/surgery*;
Middle Aged;
Adult;
Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods*;
Retrospective Studies;
Software;
Wrist Fractures
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2025;38(1):31-40
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore the accuracy of human-computer interaction software in identifying and locating type C1 distal radius fractures.
METHODS:Based on relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 cases of type C1 distal radius fractures between September 2023 and March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, comprising 3 males and 11 females(aged from 27 to 82 years). The data were assigned randomized identifiers. A senior orthopedic physician reviewed the films and measured the ulnar deviation angle, radial height, palmar inclination angle, intra-articular step, and intra-articular gap for each case on the hospital's imaging system. Based on the reduction standard for distal radius fractures, cases were divided into reduction group and non-reduction group. Then, the data were sequentially imported into a human-computer interaction intelligent software, where a junior orthopedic physician analyzed the same radiological parameters, categorized cases, and measured fracture details. The categorization results from the software were consistent with manual classifications (6 reduction cases and 8 non-reduction cases). For non-reduction cases, the software performed further analyses, including bone segmentation and fracture recognition, generating 8 diagnostic reports containing fracture recognition information. For the 6 reduction cases, the senior and junior orthopedic physicians independently analyzed the data on the hospital's imaging system and the AI software, respectively. Bone segments requiring reduction were identified, verified by two senior physicians, and measured for displacement and rotation along the X (inward and outward), Z (front and back), and Y (up and down) axes. The AI software generated comprehensive diagnostic reports for these cases, which included all measurements and fracture recognition details.
RESULTS:Both the manual and AI software methods consistently categorized the 14 cases into 6 reduction and 8 non-reduction groups, with identical data distributions. A paired sample t-test revealed no statistically significant differences (P>0.05) between the manual and software-based measurements for ulnar deviation angle, radial ulnar bone height, palmar inclination angle, intra-articular step, and joint space. In fracture recognition, the AI software correctly identified 10 C-type fractures and 4 B-type fractures. For the 6 reduction cases, a total of 24 bone fragments were analyzed across both methods. After verification, it was found that the bone fragments identified by the two methods were consistent. A paired sample t-tests revealed that the identified bone fragments and measured displacement and rotation angles along the X, Y, and Z axes were consistent between the two methods. No statistically significant differences(P>0.05) were found between manual and software measurements for these parameters.
CONCLUSION:Human-computer interaction software employing AI technology demonstrated comparable accuracy to manual measurement in identifying and locating type C1 distal radius fractures on CT imaging.
