Comparative study of two fixation methods in single segment interbody fusion and fixation with unilateral dual channel spinal endoscopic technique.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230644
- Author:
Ze-Xuan WU
1
;
Tao WANG
1
;
Zhi-Gang LEI
1
;
Xiao-Lin LI
1
;
Hao-Zhe LIU
2
;
Xiao-Yang LI
2
;
Xin-Xin BAI
2
;
Hong-Hai XU
2
Author Information
1. Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi'an 710000, Shaanxi, China.
2. Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, Shaanxi, China.
- Publication Type:English Abstract
- Keywords:
Lumbar disc herniation;
Lumbar instability;
Spinal fusion
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Female;
Middle Aged;
Spinal Fusion/methods*;
Endoscopy/methods*;
Aged;
Adult;
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery*;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*;
Retrospective Studies
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2024;37(12):1158-1163
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore clinical efficacy of unilateral and bilateral nail-rod system fixation in single-level intervertebral fusion fixation of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and instability with unilateral dual-channel spinal endoscopy.
METHODS:The clinical data of 63 patients with LDH complicated with instability treated by unilateral double-channel spinal endoscopy from March 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to intraoperative fixation methods, the patients were divided into two groups, included unilateral nail rod system fixation group(unilateral group) and bilateral nail rod system fixation group(bilateral group). There were 31 patients in unilateral group, including 15 males and 16 females; aged from 40 to 67 years old with an average of (54.65±7.32) years old; 3 patients with L3,4, 15 patients with L4,5, 13 patients with L5S1. There were 32 patients in bilateral group, including 18 males and 14 females, aged from 43 to 68 years old with an average of (56.19±6.63) years old;4 patients with L3,4, 17 patients with L4,5, 11 patients with L5S1. The time of operation, length of incision, operation time, length of hospital stay, cost of treatment, occurrence of complications and adverse events were recorded and compared between two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) of lumbar and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were compared before operation, 3 and 12 months after operation. MacNab standard was used to evaluate clinical effect.
RESULTS:Both of two groups were successfully completed operation and followed up. In unilateral fixation group, follow-up time, operation time, incision length, postoperative ambulation time, hospital stay and treatment cost were (11.81±1.08) months, (122.48±13.86) min, (3.15±0.45) cm, (3.06±0.73) d, (6.87±1.09) d, and (3.49±0.09) ten thousand yuan;while (11.47±1.16) months, (134.94±10.94) min, (6.45±0.83) cm, (3.19±0.86) d, (7.03±1.03) d, (3.77±0.12) ten thousand yuan in bilateral fixation group, respectively;there were significant differences in operation time, incision length and treatment cost between two groups (P<0.05), no significant difference in follow-up time, postoperative ambulation time and hospital stay (P>0.05). There were no significant difference in VAS of low back pain, JOA score, ODI and MacNab grade between two groups before and after operation (P>0.05). No significant complications and adverse events were observed between two groups after operation.
CONCLUSION:Both of unilateral and bilateral nail rod system for the treatment of LDH with instability could achieve the expected results. Unilateral fixation has more advantageous than bilateral fixation in terms of operation time, incision length and treatment cost. For patients with osteoporosis before operation or insufficient fixation strength of unilateral pedicle nails during surgery, bilateral fixation is feasible to enhance reliability of fixation.
