Study on the effect of the distribution of bone cement of residual back pain after percutaneous vertebra plasty.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240333
- Author:
Dong-Fang YU
1
;
Xiang-Shan WANG
1
;
De-Peng KOU
1
;
Shun-Hai CAO
1
Author Information
1. Zhengzhou Orthopaedics Hospital, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Bone cement distribution;
Percutaneous vertebra plasty;
Vertebral compression fracutures
- MeSH:
Humans;
Bone Cements;
Aged;
Male;
Female;
Middle Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
Vertebroplasty/methods*;
Back Pain/etiology*;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*;
Spinal Fractures/surgery*;
Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery*
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2024;37(11):1075-1079
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effect of bone cement distribution on efficacy of residual back pain after percutaneous vertebra plasty(PVP).
METHODS:From January 2017 to December 2020, a total of 65 cases with single segment osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures underwent parallel vertebroplasty surgery. On the basis of the postoperative X-ray films of bone cement distribution were divided into two groups. The bone cement was biased to the lateral side of the vertebral body (partial group, 20 cases), there were 9 males and 11 famales with an average age of (70.3±7.4) years old ranging from 60 to 84 years old. The bone cement was over the vertebral midline, and completely filled with contralateral vertebral body (bilateral group, 45 cases), there were 10 males and 35 famales with an average age of (70.7±8.0) years old ranging from 60 to 86 years old. All of them underwent PVP surgery, bone cement was injected into the vertebral body through paitail transpedicular approach. The amount of bone cement injection, the visual analogue scale(VAS) of preoperation and 1 day, 1 month, 3 months after surgery between two groups were observed and compared.
RESULTS:The amount of cement injection was (4.25±0.99) ml in the partial group, and (4.07±1.18) ml in the bilateral group, there was no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). Postoperative pain was relieved than preoperative pain (P<0.05), the VAS of 1 day, 1 and 3 months after operation (3.90±1.37), (2.35±0.67) and (1.55±0.51) in the partial group were higher than (2.67±0.60), (1.62±0.58) and (1.31±0.47) in the bilateral group (P<0.05). There were 9 cases in partial group, the pain was not relieved due to unfilled cement until the contralateral bone was injected into the bone cement.
CONCLUSION:The distribution of bone cement is one of the main factors affecting residual back pain after PVP, and in the clinical, we should make sure the distribution of bone cement over the midline of vertebral body.
