Diagnostic value of 99mTc-MDP three-phase bone scintigraphy combined with C-reaction protein for periprosthetic joint infection.
10.7507/1002-1892.202505091
- Author:
Guojie LIU
1
;
Xiaolan SONG
1
;
Pei ZHAI
1
;
Shipeng SONG
1
;
Weidong BAO
1
;
Yawei DUAN
1
;
Wei ZHANG
1
;
Yafeng LIU
1
;
Yongqiang SUN
1
;
Shuailei LI
1
Author Information
1. Department of Artificial Joint Revision, Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Zhengzhou Henan, 450000, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
C-reactive protein;
Three-phase bone scintigraphy;
antibiotic;
combined diagnosis;
periprosthetic joint infection
- MeSH:
Humans;
Prosthesis-Related Infections/blood*;
Middle Aged;
Male;
Female;
Aged;
C-Reactive Protein/metabolism*;
Retrospective Studies;
Adult;
Radionuclide Imaging/methods*;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects*;
Aged, 80 and over;
Technetium Tc 99m Medronate;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects*;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects*;
ROC Curve;
Reoperation;
Radiopharmaceuticals;
Young Adult
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2025;39(9):1180-1186
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of 99mTc-MDP three-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) combined with C-reactive protein (CRP) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).
METHODS:The clinical data of 198 patients who underwent revision surgery of artificial joint between January 2017 and January 2024 and received TPBS examination before surgery were retrospectively analyzed. There were 77 males and 121 females with an average age of 63.74 years ranging from 24 to 92 years. There were 90 cases of hip arthroplasty and 108 cases of knee arthroplasty. PJI was diagnosed according to the 2013 American Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) standard diagnostic criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predict value (PPV) were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the diagnostic performance of the three methods, and the area under curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance.
RESULTS:According to the 2013 MSIS criteria, 116 cases were diagnosed as PJI, and the remaining 82 cases were aseptic loosening. The cases of PJI diagnosed by TPBS, CRP, and TPBS-CRP were 125, 109, and 137 respectively, and the cases of aseptic loosening were 73, 89, and 61 respectively. The sensitivity, accuracy, NPV, and PPV of TPBS-CRP combination in the diagnosis of PJI were higher than those of TPBS and CRP, but the specificity was lower than that of TPBS and CRP. ROC curve analysis further showed that the AUC value of TPBS-CRP combination was better than that of TPBS and CRP. The severity of bone defect and the duration of symptoms in patients with false positive TPBS diagnosis were worse than those in patients with true negative TPBS diagnosis (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the survival time of prosthesis between the two groups (P>0.05). Among the patients diagnosed with PJI by TPBS, CRP, and TPBS-CRP, 49, 35, and 54 patients had received antibiotic treatment 2 weeks before diagnosis, respectively. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of TPBS and TPBS-CRP before diagnosis between patients treated with and without antibiotics and those not treated (P>0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of antibiotic therapy before CRP diagnosis was significantly lower than that of untreated patients (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:TPBS and CRP have limited specificity in differentiating PJI from aseptic loosening. The TPBS-CRP combination diagnostic method can synergize the local bone metabolic characteristics and systemic inflammatory response to achieve higher diagnostic accuracy, but caution should be exercised in patients with severe bone defects and longer symptom duration.
