Feasibility study on biomechanical indicators as supplementary evaluation to Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System for amputee patients.
10.7507/1002-1892.202502032
- Author:
Lingjie ZENG
1
;
Xuanhong HE
2
;
Minxun LU
2
;
Yong NIE
2
;
Xiangdong ZHU
1
;
Chongqi TU
2
Author Information
1. National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610064, P. R. China.
2. Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Biomechanical indicator;
Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System;
amputee patient;
supplementary evaluation
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Female;
Aged;
Biomechanical Phenomena;
Amputees/rehabilitation*;
Feasibility Studies;
Artificial Limbs;
Reproducibility of Results;
Amputation, Surgical;
Crutches;
Gait
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2025;39(6):729-734
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore the feasibility of using biomechanical indicators as supplementary evaluation to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System (MSTS) for amputee patients.
METHODS:Twenty-four patients who underwent hemipelvectomy between September 2018 and January 2025 were enrolled. There were 15 males and 9 females with an average age of 61.4 years (range, 45-76 years). Participants performed gait tests at self-selected speeds using three assistive devices (prosthesis, single crutch, and double crutches). Motion data were analyzed using a customized OpenSim model. Biomechanical indicators of the intact limb exhibiting common characteristics were screened through correlation and sensitivity analyses. Test-retest reliability [interclass correlation coefficient (ICC)] of selected parameters was assessed to evaluate their potential as MSTS score supplements.
RESULTS:All biomechanical indicators showed significant positive correlations with MSTS scores across assistive devices ( P<0.05). Seven indicators demonstrated |Pearson correlation coefficients|>0.8, including walking speed, maximum hip angle, maximum hip moment, peak hip flexion moment, peak hip extension moment, hip flexion impulse, and hip extension impulse. Among these, maximum hip moment, hip flexion impulse, and hip extension impulse exhibited significant between-group differences in adjacent MSTS levels ( P<0.05), indicating high sensitivity, along with excellent test-retest reliability (ICC>0.74, P<0.01).
CONCLUSION:Biomechanical indicators statistically qualify as potential supplements to MSTS scoring. Maximum hip moment, hip flexion impulse, and hip extension impulse demonstrate particularly high sensitivity to MSTS score variations.
