Study on assessment methods for acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty.
10.7507/1002-1892.202411005
- Author:
Jinzi WANG
1
;
Wenju CHANG
1
;
Pei ZHANG
1
;
Xiang LI
1
;
Yong ZHANG
1
;
Shuoshuo ZHANG
1
;
Hai DING
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu Anhui, 233000, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Total hip arthroplasty;
acetabular cup;
preoperative measurement;
prosthesis
- MeSH:
Humans;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation*;
Male;
Female;
Middle Aged;
Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging*;
Aged;
Hip Prosthesis;
Prosthesis Design;
Femur Head/surgery*;
Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery*;
Radiography;
Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery*;
Femur Head Necrosis/surgery*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2025;39(2):163-167
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate precise assessment methods for predicting the optimal acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
METHODS:A clinical data of 73 patients (80 hips) who underwent primary THA between December 2022 and July 2024 and met the inclusion criteria was analyzed. There were 39 males and 34 females with an average age of 66.3 years (range, 56-78 years). Among them, 66 cases were unilateral THA and 7 were bilateral THAs. There were 29 patients (34 hips) of osteoarthritis, 35 patients (35 hips) of femoral neck fractures, and 9 patients (11 hips) of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Based on anteroposterior pelvic X-ray films, three methods were employed to predict acetabular cup size, including preoperative template planning, radiographic femoral head diameter (FHD) measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement. The predicted acetabular cup sizes from these methods were compared with the actual implanted sizes.
RESULTS:The predicted acetabular cup sizes using the preoperative template planning, radiographic FHD measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement were (51.25±2.81), (49.72±3.11), and (49.90±2.74) mm, respectively, compared to the actual implanted cup size of (50.57±2.74) mm, with no significant difference ( P>0.05). Regarding agreement with the actual implanted cup size, the preoperative template planning achieved exact matches in 35 hips (43.75%), one-size deviation in 41 hips (51.25%), and two-size deviations in 4 hips (5%); the radiographic FHD measurement achieved exact matches in 12 hips (15%), one-size deviation in 57 hips (71.25%), and two-size deviations in 11 hips (13.75%); and the intraoperative FHD measurement achieved exact matches in 26 hips (32.5%), one-size deviation in 52 hips (65%), and two-size deviations in 2 hips (2.5%). There were significant differences in agreement distributions between the three methods and the actual implanted cup sizes ( H=18.579, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION:The intraoperative FHD measurement, as a simple, cost-effective, and accurate method, effectively guides acetabular cup selection, reduces the risk of prosthesis wear, enhances postoperative joint stability.
