Effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy technique combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in treatment of lumbar burst fractures.
10.7507/1002-1892.202406050
- Author:
Ting YAN
1
;
Jun ZENG
1
;
Chao WU
1
;
Xu LIN
1
;
Haigang HU
1
;
Zeli ZHONG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Center, the Fourth People's Hospital of Zigong, Zigong Sichuan, 643000, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Lumbar burst fracture;
internal fixation;
percutaneous pedicle screw;
spinal canal decompression;
unilateral bipotral endoscopy technique
- MeSH:
Humans;
Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries*;
Spinal Fractures/surgery*;
Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation*;
Endoscopy/methods*;
Decompression, Surgical/methods*;
Pedicle Screws;
Treatment Outcome;
Retrospective Studies;
Male;
Female;
Middle Aged;
Adult
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2024;38(11):1372-1378
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare the effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique assisted spinal canal decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation versus traditional open decompression and internal fixation for treatment of lumbar burst fractures.
METHODS:A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 61 patients with single-segment lumbar burst fractures who met the selection criteria and were admitted between October 2022 and December 2023. Of them, 25 patients received UBE technique assisted decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (UBE group), while 36 patients were treated with traditional posterior unilateral hemilaminectomy decompression and internal fixation (open group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups ( P>0.05), including gender, age, body mass index, fracture segment, cause of injury, AO classification of lumbar fractures, and preoperative height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, segmental kyphosis angle, rate of spinal canal invasion, the classification of American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. VAS score, ODI, and ASIA grading were used to evaluate the effectiveness before operation, at 1 week after operation, and at last follow-up. Lumbar anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT were performed to measure the segmental kyphosis angle, height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, and the rate of spinal canal invasion.
RESULTS:Surgery was successfully completed in both groups. No complication such as dural sac, nerve root, or vascular injury was found during operation, and all incisions healed by first intention. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups ( P>0.05), the UBE group revealed significant less intraoperative blood loss when compared with open group ( P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 6-20 months, with an average of 13 months. There was no loosening, breakage, or failure of internal fixation in all patients. The ASIA grading, VAS score, ODI of the two groups significantly improved at 1 week after operation and further improved at last follow-up ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in ASIA grading at 1 week after operation and last follow-up between the two groups ( P>0.05), but the VAS score and ODI in the UBE group were significantly superior to the open group ( P<0.05). At 1 week after operation, the height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra, segmental kyphosis angle, rate of spinal canal invasion significantly improved when compared to preoperative ones ( P<0.05), the height ratio of the anterior margin of injured vertebra and segmental kyphosis angle significantly decreased at last follow-up when compared to the values at 1 week after operation ( P<0.05), but the rate of spinal canal invasion was further significantly improved, and there was no significant difference between the two groups at different time point postoperatively.
CONCLUSION:UBE technique assisted spinal canal decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a safe and effective treatment for lumbar burst fractures, which with little trauma and faster recovery when compared with traditional open decompression and internal fixation.
