Assessment of upper limb rehabilitation exercise participation based on trajectory errors and surface electromyography signals.
10.7507/1001-5515.202405002
- Author:
Xiaohong WANG
1
;
Jian LYU
1
;
Shengbo FANG
1
Author Information
1. Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of the Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Fuzzy decision making;
Participation;
Surface electromyography;
Trajectory error;
Upper limb rehabilitation
- MeSH:
Humans;
Electromyography/methods*;
Upper Extremity/physiology*;
Fuzzy Logic;
Exercise Therapy/methods*;
Muscle, Skeletal/physiology*;
Male
- From:
Journal of Biomedical Engineering
2025;42(2):308-317
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
At present, upper limb motor rehabilitation relies on specific rehabilitation aids, ignoring the initiative of upper limb motor of patients in the middle and late stages of rehabilitation. This paper proposes a fuzzy evaluation method for active participation based on trajectory error and surface electromyography (sEMG) for patients who gradually have the ability to generate active force. First, the level of motor participation was evaluated using trajectory error signals represented by computer vision. Then, the level of physiological participation was quantified based on muscle activation (MA) characterized by sEMG. Finally, the motor performance and physiological response parameters were input into the fuzzy inference system (FIS). This system was then used to construct the fuzzy decision tree (FDT), which ultimately outputs the active participation level. A controlled experiment of upper limb flexion and extension exercise in 16 healthy subjects demonstrated that the method presented in this paper was effective in quantifying difference in the active participation level of the upper limb in different force-generating states. The calculation results of this method and the active participation assessment method based on sEMG during the task cycle showed that the active participation evaluation values of both methods peaked in the initial cycle: (82.34 ± 9.3) % for this paper's method and (78.44 ± 7.31) % for the sEMG method. In the subsequent cycles, the values of both showed a dynamic change trend of rising first and then falling. Trend consistency verifies the effectiveness of the active participation assessment strategy in this paper, providing a new idea for quantifying the participation level of patients in middle and late stages of upper limb rehabilitation without special equipment mediation.
