Qualitative systematic evaluation of influencing factors for implementation of clinical practice guidelines in China based on theoretical domains framework.
10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20250428.501
- Author:
Xu-Dong ZHANG
1
;
Ju-Wen ZHANG
1
;
Fan-Ya YU
1
;
Jun-Hong YU
1
;
Wei CHEN
1
Author Information
1. Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Beijing 100029, China.
- Publication Type:English Abstract
- Keywords:
clinical practice guideline;
evidence-based medicine;
guideline implementation;
implementation science
- MeSH:
China;
Humans;
Practice Guidelines as Topic;
Medicine, Chinese Traditional/standards*;
Evidence-Based Medicine
- From:
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
2025;50(13):3803-3814
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
The effective implementation of clinical practice guideline(CPG), as a crucial vehicle of evidence-based medicine, plays a vital role in improving healthcare quality and patient safety. Currently, there remains a significant gap between the actual implementation outcomes of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) guidelines and their intended objectives, which necessitates a systematic investigation into their influencing factors to optimize implementation strategies. This study aims to comprehensively identify the factors influencing CPG implementation in China, adapt the theoretical domains framework(TDF) to the local context, and integrate TCM-specific characteristics to provide recommendations for optimizing the development and implementation processes of TCM guidelines. Systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, and EMbase, covering the period from each database's inception to March 2024. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies were included to examine factors affecting the implementation of clinical practice guidelines. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the critical appraisal skills programme(CASP) tool. RESULTS:: were synthesized through framework analysis and thematic synthesis, and expert consensus was achieved via a structured consensus meeting. A total of 16 studies involving 2 388 participants were included with overall good methodological quality. Based on the TDF, 43 influencing factors across 14 domains were identified. The most critical factors included the quality of guideline evidence, training and academic conferences organized by hospitals and academic institutions to promote guideline adoption among medical staff, support from professional leaders for guideline implementation, the applicability and clarity of guideline recommendations, and material resources(supplies, funding, and facilities) required for implementation. Additionally, influencing factors of TCM guideline implementation were identified, including the distinctive advantages of TCM therapies, the applicability of syndrome differentiation, and the feasibility of TCM treatments. Based on these findings, it is recommended that TCM guideline development should incorporate these unique influencing factors to formulate high-quality, clear, and actionable recommendations. Following guideline publication, healthcare and academic institutions should strengthen training and dissemination efforts and ensure the availability of necessary implementation resources to facilitate the successful adoption of guidelines in clinical practice.
