Network Meta-analysis of Chinese patent medicines in treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20240823.501
- Author:
Yuan-Yuan ZHANG
1
;
Meng-Zhen ZHANG
1
;
Qian-Qian MA
1
;
Ji-Hong ZHOU
2
Author Information
1. Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Guangzhou 510000, China the Seventh Clinical Medicial College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Shenzhen 518000, China.
2. the Seventh Clinical Medicial College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Shenzhen 518000, China.
- Publication Type:Network Meta-Analysis
- Keywords:
Chinese patent medicine;
network Meta-analysis;
randomized controlled trial;
stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- MeSH:
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology*;
Humans;
Drugs, Chinese Herbal/administration & dosage*;
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic;
Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use*
- From:
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
2025;50(1):248-266
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
The efficacy and safety of different Chinese patent medicines in the treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) were evaluated by network Meta-analysis. The randomized controlled trial(RCT) of Chinese patent medicines for stable COPD were retrieved from CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, and Cochrane Library with the time interval from inception to February 2024. The quality of the included RCT was evaluated by the Cochrane's risk of bias assessment tool. RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16.0 were used to establish the risk of bias diagram and perform the network Meta-analysis. A total of 113 RCTs were included, involving 8 265 patients and 14 Chinese patent medicines. The network Meta-analysis yielded the following results based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA).(1) In terms of improving the forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity(FEV1/FVC) ratio, the top three treatments were Jingshuibao Capsules + conventional western medicine, Yupingfeng San + conventional western medicine, and Sanzi Zhike Capsules + conventional western medicine.(2) In terms of improving the clinical efficacy, the top three treatments were Yifei Capsules + conventional western medicine, Yupingfeng Granules + conventional western medicine, and Bufei Huoxue Capsules + conventional western medicine.(3) In terms of improving the percentage of predicted FEV1(FEV1%pred), the top three treatments were Jingshuibao Capsules + conventional western medicine, Bufei Granules + conventional western medicine, and Bailing Capsules + conventional western medicine.(4) In terms of improving the distance in 6 min walking test(6MWT), the top three treatments were Jingshuibao Capsules + conventional western medicine, Bailing Capsules + conventional western medicine, and Jianpi Yifei Oral Liquid + conventional western medicine.(5) In terms of reducing the COPD assessment test(CAT), the top three treatments were Bufei Granules + conventional western medicine, Yifei Capsules + conventional western medicine, and Yifei Huoxue Granules + conventional western medicine.(6) In terms of reducing the frequency of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD) within 1 year, the top three treatments were Yupingfeng Capsules + conventional western medicine, Yupingfeng San + conventional western medicine, and Jianpi Yifei Oral Liquid + conventional western medicine.(7) In terms of safety, 28 RCTs have reported adverse reactions, mainly involving the digestive system, circulatory system, and nervous system. The results showed that Chinese patent medicines combined with conventional western medicine improved FEV1/FVC, FEV1%pred, clinical efficacy, and 6MWT, while reducing CAT and the frequency of AECOPD within 1 year. However, due to the limitations of the included studies and the lack of direct comparisons between different interventions, these results need further validation.
