Challenges and strategies for implementing the STAR tool for comprehensive evaluation of guidelines: A qualitative study with Chinese clinicians.
10.1097/CM9.0000000000003384
- Author:
Nan YANG
1
;
Xu WANG
2
;
Hongfeng HE
3
;
Jungang ZHAO
2
;
Yishan QIN
1
;
Yueyan LI
2
;
Janne ESTILL
1
;
Junmin WEI
4
;
Yaolong CHEN
5
Author Information
1. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
2. Department of Pediatric Research Institute, Chevidence Lab of Child and Adolescent Health, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400014, China.
3. School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
4. Chinese Medical Association Publishing House, Beijing 100052, China.
5. Research Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines (2021RU017), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Chinese guidelines;
Practice guideline;
Qualitative interviews;
Quality control;
STAR
- MeSH:
Humans;
China;
Qualitative Research;
Practice Guidelines as Topic;
Interviews as Topic
- From:
Chinese Medical Journal
2025;138(21):2681-2692
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:The STAR (Scientific, Transparent, and Applicable Rankings) working group conducts regular evaluations of Chinese guidelines and consensus statements. This study gathered insights from STAR working group members using qualitative interviews.
METHODS:From March to August 2023, members of the STAR specialist committees were interviewed using semi-structured interview outline. The interviewees were selected through purpose-based sampling. Subject analysis was employed to summarize the findings.
RESULTS:We conducted interviews with 37 members from 36 committees and summarized the contents into four main themes and 16 specific topics. The value of STAR in enhancing the development and selection of high-quality guidelines in China was commonly mentioned. Challenges identified included the lack of resources and suboptimal organizational structures, collaboration, and evaluation efficiency. Suggestions for the STAR tool included developing extensions for different guideline types, adjusting certain items, and better covering guideline applicability. The promotion of STAR and the consideration of an international committee for global outreach were also highlighted.
CONCLUSION:STAR has exerted a substantial influence on the evaluation of Chinese guidelines, and the insights gained from interviews offer valuable directions for its further enhancement.
