- Author:
Leong Chai LEOW
1
;
Chuen Peng LEE
2
;
Sridhar VENKATESWARAN
3
;
Michael Teik Chung LIM
4
;
Oon Hoe TEOH
5
;
Ruth CHANG
6
;
Yam Cheng CHEE
6
;
Khai Beng CHONG
6
;
Ai Ping CHUA
7
;
Joshua GOOLEY
8
;
Hong Juan HAN
9
;
Nur Izzianie KAMARUDDIN
1
;
See Meng KHOO
10
;
Lynn Huiting KOH
11
;
Shaun Ray Han LOH
1
;
Kok Weng LYE
12
;
Mark IGNATIUS
13
;
Yingjuan MOK
14
;
Jing Hao NG
15
;
Thun How ONG
1
;
Chu Qin PHUA
16
;
Rui Ya SOH
17
;
Pei Rong SONG
1
;
Adeline TAN
18
;
Alvin TAN
19
;
Terry TAN
20
;
Jenny TANG
21
;
David TAY
22
;
Jade TAY
1
;
Song Tar TOH
23
;
Serene WONG
24
;
Chiang Yin WONG
25
;
Mimi YOW
15
Author Information
- Publication Type:Consensus Development Conference
- Keywords: adult; consensus; obstructive sleep apnoea; paediatrics; polysomnography; sleep apnoea
- MeSH: Humans; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis*; Singapore; Consensus; Adult
- From:Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2025;54(10):627-643
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION:Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is common in Singapore, with moderate to severe OSA affecting around 30% of residents. These consensus statements aim to provide scientifically grounded recommendations for the management of OSA, standar-dise the management of OSA in Singapore and promote multidisciplinary collaboration.
METHOD:An expert panel, which was convened in 2024, identified several areas of OSA management that require guidance. The expert panel reviewed the current literature and developed consensus statements, which were later independently voted on using a 3-point Likert scale (agree, neutral or disagree). Consensus (total ratings of agree and neutral) was set a priori at ≥80% agreement. Any statement not reaching consensus was excluded.
RESULTS:The final consensus included 49 statements that provide guidance on the screening, diagnosis and management of adults with OSA. Additionally, 23 statements on the screening, diagnosis and management of paediatric OSA achieved consensus. These 72 consensus statements considered not only the latest clinical evidence but also the benefits and harms, resource implications, feasibility, acceptability and equity impact of the recommendations.
CONCLUSION:The statements presented in this paper aim to guide clinicians based on the most updated evidence and collective expert opinion from sleep specialists in Singapore. These recommendations should augment clinical judgement rather than replace it. Management decisions should be individualised, taking into account the patient's clinical characteristics, as well as patient and caregiver concerns and preferences.

