In my time: A qualitative exploration of the junior doctor experience in Singapore over the years.
10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202594
- Author:
Caitlin Alsandria O'HARA
1
;
Nur Haidah Ahmad KAMAL
1
;
En Ci Isaac ONG
1
;
De Wei Isaac CHUNG
1
;
Siew Ngan Faith LIM
2
;
Malcolm Ravindran MAHADEVAN
3
Author Information
1. Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore.
2. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
3. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
burnout;
junior doctors;
medical education;
mental health;
qualitative research
- MeSH:
Singapore;
Humans;
Qualitative Research;
Medical Staff, Hospital/psychology*;
Male;
Female;
Adult;
Burnout, Professional/psychology*;
Workload/psychology*;
Attitude of Health Personnel;
Interviews as Topic;
Job Satisfaction
- From:Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
2025;54(9):542-560
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION:Despite efforts to improve junior doctors' working conditions, burnout, distress and disillusionment persist, with implications for patient outcomes. This qualitative study analysed factors shaping the lived experiences of junior doctors in Singapore and their changes over time, thereby seeking to inform improvements to working conditions.
METHOD:Thirty purposively sampled respondents who were junior doctors in Singapore between 1975 and 2022 were interviewed. Respondents were grouped into 3 cohorts: (1) junior, (2) middle and (3) senior. Employing the framework method of qualitative analysis, open coding was performed with reference to the individual, interpersonal, institutional, community and policy levels of the socioecological model (SEM). Four themes emerged: (1) inherent challenges of junior doctorship, (2) exacerbating factors, (3) alleviating factors and (4) responses of junior doctors to their experiences. Codes were reconstructed into a modified SEM, demonstrating trickle-down effects of interpersonal or structural forces on the individual doctor and pertinent factors evolving with time.
RESULTS:Across cohorts, respondents echoed mental and physical challenges. While senior cohort doctors recounted higher patient-to-doctor ratios and longer working hours, junior cohort doctors cited new difficulties. These include a hostile medicolegal landscape, patients' increasingly complex needs and expectations, and higher administrative loads. Amid these difficulties, alleviating factors included good workplace relationships alongside institutional interventions. Doctors responded differently to their challenges. Some externalised difficulties through expression and advocacy; others internalised them, whether into fulfilment or distress.
CONCLUSION:While some facets of junior doctorship have improved with time, new challenges that warrant consideration are emerging. Junior doctors should be centred, listened to and empowered in shaping improvements to working conditions.
