Oncology-related emergencies discharged from the emergency department.
10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-368
- Author:
Si-Hua Yvonne GOH
1
;
Juin Jie NG
1
;
Shi-En Joanna CHAN
2
;
Wei-Lin Tallie CHUA
2
;
Venkataraman ANANTHARAMAN
2
Author Information
1. Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore.
2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Humans;
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data*;
Retrospective Studies;
Female;
Neoplasms/diagnosis*;
Male;
Singapore;
Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data*;
Middle Aged;
Aged;
Triage;
Adult;
Emergencies;
Aged, 80 and over
- From:Singapore medical journal
2025;66(2):97-101
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION:Cancer patients attending emergency departments (EDs) often present with acute symptoms and are frequently admitted. This study aimed to characterise the profile of oncology patients who were discharged from the ED.
METHODS:This was a retrospective audit of patients with cancer-related diagnoses who presented to the ED at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) over a 6-month period from 1 October 2018 to 31 March 2019 and were directly discharged from the ED. Data was extracted from the hospital's electronic medical record system.
RESULTS:Of the 492 participants included in the study, the majority were triaged as Priority 2 (61.4%), while 30.7% were triaged as Priority 3, 6.9% as Priority 1 and 1.0% as Priority 4. There was no statistical difference between the National Early Warning scores across the different triage categories in these patients. The most common complaint was (44.3%), followed by genitourinary symptoms (19.5%) and those related to devices, catheters or stomas (17.3%). More investigations of all types were done for patients being managed in Priority 1 (57.6%) than in the other triage categories (40.1% for Priority 2, 23.2% for Priority 3 and 12.0% for Priority 4). Treatment procedures carried out were mainly symptomatic (analgesics, antiemetics, proton pump inhibitors) for 79.8% of the patients. There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients requiring various treatment modalities among the triage categories.
CONCLUSION:Selected oncological patients may potentially be managed in an ambulatory setting.
