Development of the modified Safety Attitude Questionnaire for the medical imaging department.
10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-254
- Author:
Ravi Chanthriga ETURAJULU
1
;
Maw Pin TAN
2
;
Mohd Idzwan ZAKARIA
3
;
Karuthan CHINNA
4
;
Kwan Hoong NG
5
Author Information
1. Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
2. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
3. Academic Unit, Trauma and Emergency, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
4. Faculty of Business and Management, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
5. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Humans;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Patient Safety;
Attitude of Health Personnel;
Diagnostic Imaging;
Reproducibility of Results;
Male;
Female;
Adult;
Job Satisfaction;
Factor Analysis, Statistical;
Middle Aged;
Hospitals, Teaching;
Safety Management;
Organizational Culture;
Medical Errors/prevention & control*
- From:Singapore medical journal
2025;66(1):33-40
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION:Medical errors commonly occur in medical imaging departments. These errors are frequently influenced by patient safety culture. This study aimed to develop a suitable patient safety culture assessment tool for medical imaging departments.
METHODS:Staff members of a teaching hospital medical imaging department were invited to complete the generic short version of the Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ). Internal consistency and reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's α. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine model fit. A cut-off of 60% was used to define the percentage positive responses (PPR). PPR values were compared between occupational groups.
RESULTS:A total of 300 complete responses were received and the response rate was 75.4%. In reliability analysis, the Cronbach's α for the original 32-item SAQ was 0.941. Six subscales did not demonstrate good fit with CFA. A modified five-subscale, 22-item model (SAQ-MI) showed better fit (goodness-to-fit index ≥0.9, comparative fit index ≥ 0.9, Tucker-Lewis index ≥0.9 and root mean square error of approximation ≤0.08). The Cronbach's α for the 22 items was 0.921. The final five subscales were safety and teamwork climate, job satisfaction, stress recognition, perception of management and working condition, with PPR of 62%, 68%, 57%, 61% and 60%, respectively. Statistically significant differences in PPR were observed between radiographers, doctors and others occupational groups.
CONCLUSION:The modified five-factor, 22-item SAQ-MI is a suitable tool for the evaluation of patient safety culture in a medical imaging department. Differences in patient safety culture exist between occupation groups, which will inform future intervention studies.
