Efficacy of internal limiting membrane flap technique and simple internal limiting membrane peeling in the treatment of idiopathic macular hole
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2025.12.22
- VernacularTitle:内界膜翻转覆盖术与单纯内界膜剥离术治疗特发性黄斑裂孔的疗效
- Author:
Lili CHEN
1
;
Dingding WANG
1
;
Juanjuan WANG
1
;
Shu ZHOU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology, Huizou Central People's Hospital, Huizhou 516000, Guangdong Province, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
idiopathic macular hole;
optical coherence tomography;
internal limiting membrane flap technique;
simple internal limiting membrane peeling
- From:
International Eye Science
2025;25(12):2017-2021
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
AIM: To explore the efficacy of internal limiting membrane(ILM)flap technique and simple ILM peeling in the treatment of idiopathic macular hole(IMH)and related influencing factors.METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on totally 32 patients(35 eyes)with IMH who received surgery at our department from January 2023 to November 2024. All the patients simultaneously received phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation, and they were divided into study group(19 eyes)and control group(16 eyes), with ILM flap technique and simple ILM peeling received in the two groups, respectively. The closure situation of macular hole, best corrected vision acuity(BCVA), and macular structure were observed in the two groups of patients. Furthermore, the correlation of BCVA and healing type of macular hole at the last time of follow-up with each parameter was analyzed.RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the two groups of patients in preoperative general characteristics(all P>0.05). At the last time of follow-up, the macular hole was heeled in both groups, with 7 eyes of U-shaped heeling, 6 eyes of V-shaped heeling, and 6 eyes of irregular heeling in the study group, and with 13 eyes of U-shaped of heeling, 1 eye of V-shaped heeling and 2 eyes of irregular heeling in the control group(χ2=7.167, P=0.028). The postoperative BCVA was better than preoperative level(all P<0.05), there were no statistical significant differences between the two groups of patients in macular choroidal thickness before and after surgery(P>0.05), but the macular retinal thickness of the study group was thinner than that of the control group(168.11±92.11 vs 235.56±92.18 μm, P=0.03). Pearson correlation analysis indicated that BCVA at the last time of follow-up was positively correlated with the preoperative minimum diameter(r=0.476, P<0.05)and the diameter hole index(r=0.361, P<0.05), and negatively correlated with traction hole index(r=-0.364, P=0.031); Keendall correlation analysis showed that the postoperative closure types positively correlated with the basal diameter(τ=0.296, P=0.029), minimum diameter(τ=0.366, P=0.007), and visual acuity at the last time of follow-up(τ=0.412, P=0.003), while negatively correlated with macular hole index(τ=-0.415, P=0.002)and traction hole index(τ=-0.511, P<0.01). During the follow-up period, neither group of patients experienced postoperative complications.CONCLUSION: Both ILM flap technique and simple ILM peeling are safe and effective in treating IMH. As the smaller the basal diameter and minimum diameter of the macular hole, the larger the macular hole index and traction hole index, the probability of U-shaped heeling after surgery is greater and the visual acuity is better.
