Fine setting and effect evaluation of parenteral nutrition refined medication rules
- VernacularTitle:肠外营养精细化用药规则设置及效果评价
- Author:
Yu CHEN
1
;
Jie GU
1
;
Lanping DING
1
;
Zhuyue MA
1
;
Hongyu YUAN
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy，the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University，Nanjing 210029，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
refined medication rules;
parenteral nutrition
- From:
China Pharmacy
2025;36(20):2588-2592
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To establish refined medication rules for parenteral nutrition （PN） and evaluate its effectiveness. METHODS Refined medication rules for PN were constructed based on drug instructions， relevant guidelines， and expert consensus. Through the pre-approval review system of prescription automatic screening system （PASS）， PN prescription information for inpatients from January to December 2024 （referred to as “post-intervention”） was collected to analyze the post- intervention prescription review status. PN prescription information for inpatients at our hospital from January to December 2023 and January to December 2024 was collected through the medical order review system to evaluate the rationality rates of PN prescriptions. RESULTS The established refined medication rules for PN included system module rules （including nutrients， drug compatibility， PN concentration and osmotic pressure） and custom review rules （covering off-label drug use， drug compatibility， and other drug use conditions）. As of December 2024， the PASS pre-approval review system had established a total of 102 rules， comprising 55 system module rules and 47 custom review rules for PN. After intervention， when comparing with the first quarter of 2024， the number of PN reviewed and intervened by pharmacists decreased， the pharmacist intervention rate dropped， while the rate of physician modifications following pharmacist intervention increased in the fourth quarter. The primary types of irrational prescriptions identified by the system module rules were irrational PN concentration and osmotic pressure. The primary types of irrational prescriptions identified by the custom review rules were off-label drug use （specifically indications for amino acids） and irrational drug incompatibility. In 2024， the number of false-positive tasks and the false-positive rate initially increased and then decreased， while both the number of irrational prescriptions identified through manual review and the false-negative rate showed a declining trend. In 2024， the overall rationality rate after manual review PN refined medication rules for PN medical order review system significantly increased compared to that in 2023 （P＜0.01）. CONCLUSIONS The refined medication rules for PN in our hospital were established successfully， which can reduce the PN-induced risks and significantly improve the rationality of PN prescriptions.
