Application of multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis in evaluation of the effect of staged surgery on breast cancer-related lymphedema
10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20240130-00033
- VernacularTitle:多频生物电阻抗分析在乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿患者分期手术疗效评价中的应用
- Author:
Xin LIU
1
;
Wenbin SHEN
;
Song XIA
;
Yuguang SUN
;
Kun CHANG
;
Jianfeng XIN
;
Ran AN
;
Zhong LIU
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院淋巴外科,北京 100038
- Keywords:
Breast cancer;
Lymphedema;
Liposuction;
Lymphaticovenous anastomosis;
Multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Microsurgery
2024;47(4):368-374
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the significance of multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA) in the combined surgical treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 30 patients with unilateral postoperative BCRL. The patients recieved staged liposuction and lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) from April to October 2021 at the Department of Lymphatic Surgery in Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University. After LVA surgery, patients were followed-up by telephone and other means, and asked to come to the hospital at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. The circumference of each part of the upper limbs, the length of forearm and arm were measured, and the limb volume was calculated. MFBIA were also performed to record limb bioelectrical impedance, extracellular water(ECW), and extracellular water ratios (ECW/TBW). SPSS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis. Clinical data of the patients were analysed by One-way Repeated Measurement Anova to examine the changes in volume of the affected arms before and after surgery and the changes in values collected by MFBIA. Subsequently, differences in the volumes and values of MFBIA of the affected arms before and after surgery, and the ratios of the above were analysed by paired t-test to compare each pair, then followed by Pearson correlation test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:After liposuction, the volume differences of affected and healthy arms were reduced from 1 147 ml ± 484 ml before surgery to 261 ml ± 304 ml after surgery, which achieved a significant reduction with statistical significance ( P<0.05). However, there were no significant changes in ECW or bioelectrical impedance at various frequencies (1-1 000 K) ( P>0.05). After LVA, the differences in volume of the affected and healthy arms further decreased to 17 ml±264 ml with statistical significance compared to that before surgery ( P<0.05), ECW decreased from 1.115 L ± 0.207 L to 0.937 L ± 0.164 L with statistical significance ( P<0.05), ECW/TBW decreased from 0.412 ± 0.008 to 0.405 ± 0.007 with statistical significance ( P<0.05), and the bioelectrical impedance at various frequencies was significantly increased with statistical significance ( P<0.05). After LVA, the difference in arm volume was positively correlated with the difference in ECW (correlation coefficient 0.602, P<0.05), positively correlated with the difference in Rate of ECW (correlation coefficient 0.560, P<0.05), and negatively correlated with the ratios of impedance at various frequencies (correlation coefficients 0.529-0.545, P<0.05). Conclusion:In the staged surgical treatment of BCRL, with the application of MFBIA, it is found that lymphatic liposuction removes the pathological adipose tissue of an arm, hence significantly reduces the volume of the affected arm. However, lymphatic stasis remains unrelieved, therefore without a significant reduction in arm oedema. After the second-stage LVA, the improvement of lymphatic return leads to the relief of arm oedema, and the volume of the affected arm approaches to that of the healthy side. MFBIA can be used for assessment of arm oedema.
