Effects of cross-education combined with electromyography biofeedback intervention on wrist dorsal exten-sion function in patients with subacute stroke
10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2024.09.012
- VernacularTitle:交叉迁移联合肌电生物反馈干预对亚急性期脑卒中患者腕背伸功能的影响
- Author:
Han QIN
1
;
Xiaoni WEN
;
Xueping BO
Author Information
1. 西安体育学院研究生部,陕西省西安市,710068;江苏省泰兴市人民医院
- Keywords:
cross-education;
electromyography biofeedback;
stroke;
subacute phase;
wrist extension
- From:
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
2024;39(9):1321-1326
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the effect of cross-education combined with electromyography(EMG)biofeedback inter-vention on the wrist dorsal extension function of patients with subacute stroke. Method:Forty-five patients with subacute stroke were randomly divided into cross-education group,EMG bio-feedback group,and combined group,with 15 cases in each group.The patients of three groups received rou-tine rehabilitation training.The cross-education group performed additional cross-education training on this ba-sis,the EMG biofeedback group performed additional EMG biofeedback training,and the combined group per-formed additional cross-education combined with EMG biofeedback.The above treatment lasted for 6 weeks,and before and after treatment,active joint range of motion(AROM),manual muscle test(MMT),simpli-fied Fugl-Meyer motor function score:upper extremity(FMA-UE),modified Barthel index(MBI)were used to assess the patient's wrist extension function,upper limb motor function and activities of daily living. Result:Before treatment,the three groups had no significant difference in FMA-UE score,wrist dorsiflexion AROM,muscle strength score,and MBI score(P＞0.05).After 6 weeks treatment,the FMA-UE score,wrist dorsiflexion AROM,muscle strength score,and MBI score of the three groups were significantly improved compared with those before treatment(P＜0.05).When comparison among the groups,there was no significant difference in MBI score(P＞0.05),and other index score comparisons showed significant differences(P＜0.05),and there was no significant difference in the comparison of the cross-education group and the EMG biofeed-back group(P＞0.05). Conclusion:Cross-education combined with EMG biofeedback is better than single cross-education or EMG biofeedback intervention in improving the wrist extension function,upper limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with subacute stroke.
