Impacts of delivery techniques,treatment sites and dose-volume algorithms on results of three-dimensional dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans
10.19745/j.1003-8868.2024215
- VernacularTitle:调强技术、治疗部位以及剂量体积算法对调强放疗计划三维剂量验证结果的影响研究
- Author:
Xian-Cheng PENG
1
;
Yan-Ming LIU
;
Wen-Li LU
;
Han-Yin ZHANG
;
Ying LI
;
Xin YI
Author Information
1. 重庆医科大学附属永川医院,重庆 402160
- Keywords:
delivery technique;
treatment site;
dose-volume algorithm;
intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan;
three-dimensional dosimetric verification
- From:
Chinese Medical Equipment Journal
2024;45(11):54-59
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the influence of different delivery techniques,treatment sites and dose-volume algorithms on the results of three-dimensional dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)plans and the importance of individualized quality assurance(QA)evaluation standard for radiotherapy plans.Methods Totally 350 tumor patients receiving radiotherapy at some hospital from January 2017 to February 2022 had their three-dimensional dosimetric verification results of IMRT plans selected retrospectively and underwent data collection with COMPASS system,and then were grouped in terms of delivery technique(fixed-beam IMRT and volumetric modulated arc therapy),treatment site(neck,chest and abdomen)and dose-volume algorithm(anisotropic analytical algorithm and collapsed cone convolution algorithm).All the groups were compared based on the 3％/2 mm criterion with regard to the Gamma pass rate of 10％prescription dose area(GP10％),Gamma pass rate(GP50％)and mean Gamma index(μGI5o％)of 50％prescription dose area,dose of 95％target volume(D95％)and its mean dose(Dmean),parotid gland mean dose(Dmean),dose of 1％spinal cord volume(D1％),dose of 1％brain stem volume(D1％)of head and neck radiotherapy plan,heart and lung mean dose(Dmean)and dose of 1％spinal cord volume(D1％)of chest radiotherapy plan and bladder,rectum and femur mean dose of abdomen radiotherapy plan(Dmean).SPSS 26.0 software was used for statistical analysis.Results For different delivery techniques,significant differences were found in all the QA results except GP50％of abdomen radiotherapy plan(P＜0.05).For different treatment sites,the differences were statistically significant between the QA results of head and neck radiotherapy plan and abdomen plan and between those of chest radio-therapy plan and abdomen radiotherapy plan(P＜0.05),while were not significant between the QA results of head and neck radiotherapy plan and chest radiotherapy plan(P＞0.05).For different dose-volume algorithms,the QA results had significant differences except D5％of abdomen radiotherapy planning target volume and Dmean and D1％of chest radiotherapy PTV(P＜0.05).Conclusion Dosimetric verification results vary depending on the delivery technique,treatment site and dose-volume algorithm.Statistical process control recommended by AAPM TG-218 report may be involved in to establish individualized QA standard for radiotherapy plans in case universal action limits are not appropriate.[Chinese Medical Equipment Journal,2024,45(11):54-59]
