Comparison of the performance of different nutritional screening tools for preoperative patients with Crohn's disease
10.16151/j.1007-810x.2024.02.008
- VernacularTitle:不同营养筛查工具在克罗恩病病人术前营养筛查中的应用比较
- Author:
Ze-Hua ZHAO
1
;
Chu-Lin CHEN
;
Xiang-Hong YE
;
Yi LI
Author Information
1. 东部战区总医院全军普通外科研究所,江苏南京210002
- Keywords:
Crohn's disease;
Malnutrition;
Screen;
Nursing assessment;
Surgical nursing
- From:
Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition
2024;31(2):114-117,123
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the application value of different nutritional screening tools in the evaluation of preoperative malnutrition assessment of Crohn's patients. Methods:Using the convenient sampling method, a retrospective analysis was conducted on CD patients who underwent elective surgery at the general surgery department of General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command from January 2021 to March 2022. The preoperative nutritional status of the patients was understood. Taking the consensus on malnutrition assessment diagnosis standards (GLIM) as the gold standard. The correlation, difference and diagnostic efficacy of 3 nutritional risk screening tools were compared. Results:A total of 212 patients were included. Using GLIM as the diagnostic standard, 131 patients (61.79％) had malnutrition. The incidence of malnutrition risk was 66.03％, 85.38％ and 55.66％ using NRS 2002 score, NS IBD score and PNI score, respectively. The sensitivities of the above three scores in the preoperative nutritional screening of IBD patients were 81.46％, 85.48％, 79.63％, respectively; the specificity were 62.36％, 54.71％, 57.12％, respectively; and the areas under the curve were 0.749, 0.763, 0.831, respectively. In the evaluation of diagnostic efficacy, NS IBD score had the highest sensitivity, and NRS 2002 had the best specificity. Conclusion:For patients with Crohn's disease undergoing elective surgery, the three nutritional risk screening tools can provide a basis for malnutrition risk screening. The items of PNI score are objective, concise, and convenient. As for the evaluation of diagnostic efficacy, the NS IBD score has the highest sensitivity and the NRS 2002 has the best specificity.
