A prospective cohort study on the effect of implant restoration following micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation at molar extraction sockets with severe periodontitis
10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20231123-00264
- VernacularTitle:重度牙周炎磨牙拔牙同期微翻瓣牙槽嵴保存术后种植修复效果的前瞻性队列研究
- Author:
Yiping WEI
1
;
Tao XU
;
Wenjie HU
;
Yunsong LIU
;
Yutong SHI
Author Information
1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院牙周科 国家口腔医学中心 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 口腔生物材料和数字诊疗装备国家工程研究中心 口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室，北京 100081
- Keywords:
Periodontitis;
Molar;
Tooth extraction;
Alveolar ridge preservation;
Dental implantation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2024;59(4):318-325
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the survival rate, success rate, soft tissue conditions and marginal bone level changes of implants following micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation at molar extraction sockets with severe periodontitis, compared to natural healing.Methods:From March 2015 to January 2017, patients scheduled for molar extraction as a consequence of severe periodontitis and planned implant-retained prostheses from Department of Periodontology Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology were selected. A total of 40 molar extraction sockets from 40 patients received implant placement following micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation or natural healing. The front consecutive 20 teeth were assigned to the natural healing group, and the back ones were assigned to the micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation (MCF-ARP) group. The superstructures were placed 6 months later. Within 2 weeks (baseline) and 1, 2 and 3 years after implant crown restoration, modified plaque index, probing depth, modified bleeding index and keratinized tissue width were recorded every six months. Parallel periapical radiographs were taken to evaluate the peri-implant marginal bone level and to calculate marginal bone loss. Independent sample t test or Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the differences in the above clinical and imaging indicators between the two groups. Results:The implant survival rate and success rate of the two groups were both 100% (20/20). There were no significant differences in the modified plaque index, probing depth, modified bleeding index, buccal keratinized tissue width and marginal bone loss between two groups at 1, 2 and 3 years after implant crown restoration (all P>0.05). Marginal bone loss was 0.22 (0.14, 0.34) mm in the natural healing group and 0.21 (0.12, 0.30) mm in the MCF-ARP group at a 3-year post-loading evaluation. Conclusions:Within the limitations of the present study, implants placed at ridge preserved and naturally healed molar extraction sockets with severe periodontitis demonstrate comparable clinical outcomes at a 3-year post-loading evaluation.
