Construction of a scientific research indicator evaluation system for pharmaceutical personnel from the perspective of children’s hospital
- VernacularTitle:儿童医院视角下药学人员科研指标评价体系的构建
- Author:
Yan GAO
1
;
Xin LI
1
;
Xiang GAO
1
;
Yanyan SUN
2
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy，Tianjin Children’s Hospital （Children’s Hospital，Tianjin University），Tianjin 300134，China;Tianjin Key Laboratory of Birth Defects for Prevention and Treatment，Tianjin 300134，China
2. Dept. of Pharmacy，Tianjin Children’s Hospital （Children’s Hospital，Tianjin University），Tianjin 300134，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
evaluation of scientific research ability;
evaluation indicator system;
children’s hospital;
pediatric pharmacist
- From:
China Pharmacy
2024;35(18):2193-2198
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To establish a research indicator evaluation system suitable for pharmaceutical personnel in children’s hospitals， and provide technical support and reference basis for the evaluation of scientific research capabilities of pharmacy personnel. METHODS The literature/text research methods were adopted to search related literature， policies， regulations and research reports of scientific research management； brainstorming method was used to sort out the key elements and decompose the indicators at all levels step by step. On this basis， using the method of expert interview， the key elements were clarified， the three- level index evaluation system was preliminarily drawn up， and the letter inquiry paper was made accordingly. Finally， Delphi method was used to establish the evaluation system of scientific research indicators for pharmacists through three screening criteria [importance assignment＞3.5， coefficient of variation＜25%， and unimportant percentage （including unimportant and very unimportant）＜50%]. RESULTS Overall 36 questionnaires were distributed by two rounds of expert letters， and 36 questionnaires were recovered， with a recovery rate and an effective rate of 100% for both rounds. The average expert judgment coefficient was 0.912， the average expert familiarity level was 0.747， and the average expert authority coefficient was 0.830. After the second round of letters and inquiries， the values of Kendall’s W of the first-level， the second-level and the third-level indicators were 0.269， 0.379 and 0.460， which were significantly higher than the results of the first round of inquiry （P＜0.01）. Finally， the evaluation system of scientific research indicators for pharmacists was determined with 4 first-level indicators， 18 second-level indicators and 62 third-level indicators. CONCLUSIONS The pharmaceutical experts from the children’s hospital selected in this study have high authority and wide professional coverage； the evaluation system of scientific research indicators for pharmacists has certain standards and norms， which can provide a powerful reference for the professional level assessment and scientific research ability evaluation of pharmacists.
