Construction of leadership evaluation indicator system for managers in primary medical institutions
10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20230912-00151
- VernacularTitle:基层医疗机构管理者领导力评价指标体系的构建
- Author:
Sen YANG
1
;
Hua JIN
;
Jianwei SHI
;
Chen CHEN
;
Xuhua GE
;
Xiaoxiao SHI
;
Jianjun SHI
;
Dehua YU
Author Information
1. 同济大学附属杨浦医院全科医学科 上海市全科医学与社区卫生发展研究中心 同济大学医学院全科医学研究中心，上海 200090
- Keywords:
Leadership;
Evaluation;
Managers in primary healthcare institutions;
Delphi method;
Analytic hierarchy process
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
2024;23(3):229-236
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct a leadership evaluation indicator system for managers in primary healthcare institutions.Methods:This study was a qualitative research. Based on the Chinese Academy of Sciences′ Five Forces Model of Leadership, the framework of the leadership evaluation indicator system for primary healthcare institution managers was initially constructed through literature review, expert interviews, surveys, and group discussions. From November 2020 to June 2021, 19 experts were invited to participate in two rounds of Delphi expert consultations. Based on the consultation results, the leadership evaluation indicator system for primary healthcare institution managers was developed, and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to determine the weight of each indicator.Results:Nineteen consulting experts were included in the study, 13 of whom were aged 40 years or older, and seven of whom had 20 years or more of professional experience. The response rates of the two rounds of Delphi expert consultation questionnaires were 18/19 and 19/19, respectively; the authority coefficients of the experts were 0.92 and 0.91, respectively. In the second round of consultation, the coordination coefficients of each level of indicators were 0.640, 0.557, and 0.512 ( P<0.05), respectively. The constructed leadership indicator system for managers of primary healthcare institutions included five primary indicators, 16 secondary indicators, and 44 tertiary indicators. The primary indicators, in order of their weight, were "influence"(0.299),"decisiveness"(0.245),"control"(0.156),"inspiration"(0.150), and "foresight"(0.150). Conclusions:This study is a preliminary construction of a leadership evaluation indicator system for managers of primary healthcare institutions, which can be a reference for the training and evaluation of relevant talents.
