Effects of renal ROI and depth calibrated by 99Tc m-DMSA renal imaging on GFR measurement of the injured-kidney in infants with congenital hydronephrosis
10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20221024-00318
- VernacularTitle:99Tc m－DMSA肾显像校正肾脏ROI及深度对先天性肾积水患儿患肾GFR测定的影响
- Author:
Ke GUO
1
;
Deshan ZHAO
Author Information
1. 山西医科大学第二医院核医学科，太原 030001
- Keywords:
Hydronephrosis;
Glomerular filtration rate;
Radionuclide imaging;
Technetium Tc 99m dimercaptosuccinic acid;
Technetium Tc 99m pentetate
- From:
Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
2024;44(1):20-24
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the application value of 99Tc m-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal static imaging to correct renal ROI and renal depth in measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of the injured-kidney in infants with congenital hydronephrosis. Methods:From January 2022 to November 2022, 30 infants with congenital hydronephrosis (25 males, 5 females, age 3.0(1.0, 5.5) months) in Nuclear Medicine Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were prospectively included. Sixty kidneys were divided into 3 groups according to the degree of hydronephrosis: normal group (7 left kidneys and 12 right kidneys), mild hydronephrosis group (10 left kidneys and 12 right kidneys) and moderate to severe hydronephrosis group (13 left kidneys and 6 right kidneys). The patients received 99Tc m-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (DTPA) diuretic renal dynamic imaging and 99Tc m-DMSA renal static imaging within 3 days, and bilateral renal lateral acquisition was performed at the end of the imaging. The depths (cm) of kidneys measured based on the lateral image and Tonnesen′s formula were compared. The single kidney GFR (ml·min -1·1.73 m -2) measured after the renal ROI corrected, or renal depth corrected, or renal ROI-depth corrected by renal static imaging (aGFR single, dGFR single, adGFR single) was compared with that measured by Gates method (gGFR single). The one-way analysis of variance, the least significant difference- t test and Dunnett- t test were used for data analysis. Results:In different hydronephrosis groups, renal depths measured by dynamic imaging, static imaging and Tonnesen formulas were significantly different ( F values: 38.07-59.63, t values: 2.53-15.17, all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in renal depth between the two kinds of imaging in the normal group ( F values: 34.89, 54.30, both P<0.05; t values: 0.65, 1.60, both P>0.05). aGFR single of all groups were smaller than gGFR single, but the values were similar, and were not significantly different in normal kidneys ( F values: 3.02, 5.51, both P<0.05; t values: 0.12, 0.53, both P>0.05), while those in abnormal kidneys (left kidneys: 43.27±8.84 vs 46.19±7.88, F=9.75, t=2.18, both P<0.05; right kidneys: 39.87±10.25 vs 42.94±10.28, F=10.32, t=2.04, both P<0.05) and in mild (48.58±10.94 vs 51.08±11.44, F=10.34, t=2.04, both P<0.05), moderate to severe (34.41±8.84 vs 37.62±8.84, F=19.97, t=3.41, both P<0.05) hydronephrosis groups were different. The dGFR single was significantly higher than gGFR single in 3 (normal, mild, moderate to severe) hydronephrosis groups ( t values: 3.82, 3.39, 3.81, all P<0.01). adGFR single was between aGFR single and dGFR single, and adGFR single were significantly different from gGFR single in normal right kidneys, in abnormal kidneys and in mild and moderate to severe hydronephrosis groups ( t values: 2.25-3.12, all P<0.05). Conclusions:Renal static imaging corrected ROI can improve the accuracy of GFR measurement of the affected kidney, especially for children with moderate and severe congenital hydronephrosis. However, the GFR corrected for renal depth or ROI-depth are significantly different from the true GFR. The lateral kidney depth measured by static imaging is more accurate than that measured by dynamic imaging.
