Comparison of three design methods of hybrid boost plan based on Monaco in radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
10.19745/j.1003-8868.2023228
- VernacularTitle:基于Monaco计划系统的3种混合推量计划设计方法在鼻咽癌放疗中的差异比较
- Author:
Ying CHEN
1
;
Ru-Jia LIU
;
Zhi-Peng ZHONG
;
Liu-Yang YU
;
Yang JIAO
;
Shu-Ting XU
Author Information
1. 荆门市人民医院肿瘤防治中心,湖北荆门 448000
- Keywords:
Manaco planning system;
simultaneous integrated boost;
sequence boost;
hybrid boost;
nasopharyngeal carcino-ma;
intensity-modulated radiotherapy
- From:
Chinese Medical Equipment Journal
2023;44(11):50-55
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the differences of three design methods of hybrid boost(HB)plan based on Monaco in radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods Ten patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in some hospital from January to December 2021 were selected,and Monaco planning system was used to design a simultaneous integrated boost(SIB)IMRT plan SIB-IMRT33f with a prescription fraction of 33f for each patient,keeping the fraction dose unchanged and modifying the prescription fraction to 28f to obtain a SIB-IMRT28f plan.SIB-IMRT5f1,SIB-IMRT5f2 and SIB-IMRT5f3 plans were formed based on the SIB-IMRT28f plan respectively by using the Bias Plan function,adding a prescription with a prescription fraction of 5f or copying the SIB-IMRT33f plan,modifying the prescription fraction to 5f and executing re-optimization after deleting PTV2 optimization function,then Plan_HB1,Plan_HB2 and Plan_HB3 were got by fusing SIB-IMRT28f with SIB-IMRT5e,SIB-IMRT5f2 and SIB-IM RT5f3 plans.Differences in dosimetric and therapeutic parameters were compared among the three HB plans and statistically analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software.Results The dose distributions of the three HB plans all met clinical treatment requirements,and the dose distribution of Plan_HB2 was roughly equivalent to that of Plan_HB3.Plan-HB1 behaved better significantly than Plan_HB2 and Plan_HB3 in D2％of planning gross tumor volume(PGTV)and PGTV1 target area and D2％,Dmean homogeneity index and VPTV2,56 of PTV2 target area(P＜0.05);Plan_HB2 and Plan_HB3 both had Dmean of parotid gland,V55 of cochlea,Dmean of oral cavity,Dmean of larynx and Vbody-PTV outside the target area increased significantly when compared with Plan_HB1 plan(P＜0.05);SIB-IMRT5f2 and SIB-IMRT5G had the number of segments,number of monitor units and delivery time decreased when com-pared with SIB-IMRT5f1(P＜0.05).Conclusion All the three HB plan design methods based on Monaco planning system are feasible in nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy.In terms of dosimetric and therapeutic parameters,Plan_HB2 is roughly equivalent to Plan_HB3,with some dosimetric parameters inferior to while some therapeutic parameters superior to those of Plan_HB1.[Chinese Medical Equipment Journal,2023,44(11):50-55]
