The nursing intervention of ultrasound drug penetration in the application of the digestive tract cancer patients′ postoperative rapid recovery
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20230313-00622
- VernacularTitle:超声药物渗透治疗的护理干预在消化道肿瘤患者术后快速康复中的应用
- Author:
Le WANG
1
;
Bingxin LIU
Author Information
1. 大连医科大学附属第二医院采血室，大连 116023
- Keywords:
Gastrointestinal neoplasms;
Ultrasonic drug permeation therapy;
Rapid recovery after surgery;
Intensive nursing intervention
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2024;40(3):161-166
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the impact of nursing intervention in strengthening the implementation of ultrasound drug penetration therapy on postoperative rapid recovery of patients with digestive tract tumors after surgery, and to provide reference for the formulation of intervention plans for postoperative rapid recovery of digestive tract tumor patients.Methods:A randomized controlled trial was used. From April to July 2021, 120 postoperative patients with digestive tract tumors admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University were selected and divided into a control group, a dispersed treatment group, and a concentrated treatment group according to the random number table method, with 40 patients in each group. The control group mainly received routine accelerated rehabilitation surgical care, supplemented by early rehabilitation training; the dispersed treatment group received nursing intervention with ultrasound drug penetration therapy on the basis of the control group, once a day in the morning and once in the afternoon, lasting for 30 min each time; on the basis of the control group, the concentrated treatment group received nursing intervention of one-time concentrated ultrasound drug penetration therapy for 60 min. The gastrointestinal reactions, intestinal function recovery, hospitalization, postoperative complications, and nursing satisfaction of each group of patients were observed and compared using one-way ANOVA, LSD- t test, and χ2 test. Results:There were 27 males and 13 females in the control group, aged (61.85 ± 16.85) years old. while 23 males and 17 females in the dispersed treatment group aged (60.90 ± 16.88) years old, and 23 males and 17 females in the concentrated treatment group aged (59.80 ± 13.58) years old. The duration of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distension symptoms, recovery time of bowel sounds, recovery time of exhaust, and first meal time in the dispersed treatment group and concentrated treatment group were (38.58 ± 2.74), (17.45 ± 1.92), (38.76 ± 3.34), (50.04 ± 2.57) h and (36.79 ± 2.58), (16.48 ± 1.85), (36.98 ± 2.28), (48.25 ± 3.07) h, respectively, which were lower than those in the control group (43.13 ± 3.56), (21.24 ± 2.50) (42.65 ± 3.78), (52.21 ± 3.15) h, the differences were statistically significant ( t values were 3.38-9.68, all P<0.05). The duration of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distension symptoms, recovery time of bowel sounds, recovery time of exhaust, and first meal time in the concentrated treatment group were shorter than those in the dispersed treatment group, and the differences were statistically significant ( t values were 2.31-3.01, all P<0.05). The time to get out of bed activity and hospitalization of patients in the dispersed treatment group and the concentrated treatment group were (5.83 ± 1.20) h, (9.90 ± 2.12) d and (7.35 ± 2.13) h, (8.30 ± 1.42) d, respectively. The control group was (4.39 ± 1.53) h and (14.93 ± 2.56) d, respectively. The time to get out of bed activity and hospitalization of patients in the dispersed treatment group and the concentrated treatment group were better than those in the control group, while the time to get out of bed activity and hospitalization of patients in the concentrated treatment group were better than those in the dispersed treatment group, the differences were statistically significant ( t values were -7.14-14.34, all P<0.05). The incidence of intestinal obstruction was 15.0% (6/40) in the control group, 5.0% (2/40) in the dispersed treatment group, and 0 in the concentrated treatment group, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=7.50, P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of patients in the concentrated treatment group reached 100.00% (40/40), which was 92.5% (37/40) and 85.0% (34/40) in the dispersed treatment group and control group, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=6.49, P<0.05). Conclusions:Nursing intervention through ultrasound drug penetration therapy, especially centralized treatment, can significantly improve postoperative intestinal function, reduce postoperative gastrointestinal reactions, shorten hospitalization time, reduce postoperative complications, accelerate patient recovery, and provide effective nursing intervention plans for clinical practice. It is worth promoting and applying.
