Analysis of the effectiveness of radioiodine therapy for papillary thyroid cancer at intermediate and high risk of recurrence
10.3760/cma.j.cn.115807-20230730-00033
- VernacularTitle:中危和高危复发风险的甲状腺乳头状癌放射性碘治疗的有效性分析
- Author:
Yu WANG
1
;
Hailong TAN
;
Shi CHANG
Author Information
1. 中南大学湘雅医院普外科甲状腺亚专科，长沙 410008
- Keywords:
Papillary thyroid cancer;
Radioactive iodine;
Recurrence
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
2024;18(1):40-44
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the effectiveness of radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with an intermediate and high risk of recurrence.Methods:The clinical data of 709 cases of PTC, comprising 226 men and 483 women, who underwent surgical treatment for thyroid cancer at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from Oct. 2010 to Jan. 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether RAI treatment was performed after initial surgery or not, they were divided into a RAI group (253 cases with intermediate risk and 209 cases with high risk) and a non-RAI group (147 cases with intermediate risk and 100 cases with high risk), and the relationship between RAI treatment and clinicopathological characteristics such as sex, age, and tumor size for intermediate- and high-risk PTC was analyzed by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test and Logistic regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the recurrence-free survival rate. Results:The treatment rate of intermediate-risk PTC RAI was 63.25% (253/400) and that of high-risk PTC RAI was 67.64% (209/309). Univariate analysis of intermediate-risk PTC showed that age, bilateral tumors, lymph node metastasis stage, number of lymph node metastases, and intermediate-risk PTC RAI treatment were closely related (all P values <0.05). Multi-factor regression analysis of intermediate-risk PTC showed that age ≥ 55 ( OR=0.282, P=0.005), lymph node metastasis stage N1b ( OR=19.245, P<0.001), and the number of lymph node metastases ≤ 5 ( OR=0.322, P<0.001) were independent predictors of RAI treatment for intermediate-risk PTC (all P values < 0.05). The recurrence-free survival curve for intermediate-risk PTC showed a lower recurrence-free survival rate in the RAI group than in the non-RAI group, but the difference was borderline significant ( P=0.049). Univariate analysis of high-risk PTC showed that age, multifocal tumors, bilateral tumors, lymph node metastasis stage, number of lymph node metastases and high-risk PTC RAI treatment were strongly associated (all P values <0.05). Multifactorial regression analysis for high-risk PTC showed that age ≥ 55 ( OR=0.382, P=0.020), bilateral tumors ( OR=2.173, P=0.030), lymph node metastasis stage N1b ( OR=11.215, P<0.001), and the number of lymph node metastases ≤5 ( OR=0.389, P=0.004) were independent predictors of RAI treatment for high-risk PTC patients (all P values <0.05). The recurrence-free survival curve for high-risk PTC showed a lower recurrence-free survival rate in the RAI group than in the non-RAI group, however, the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.07) . Conclusions:No significant benefit was observed with RAI treatment for intermediate- and high-risk PTC and rigorous screening of eligible patients is recommended.
