Nutritional risk and its correlation with related indexes in inpatients with aplastic anemia
10.3969/j.issn.1006-2483.2024.03.036
- VernacularTitle:再生障碍性贫血住院患者营养风险与相关指标的关联分析
- Author:
Ting WANG
1
;
Xiaorong HE
1
;
Sha MENG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Hematology , West China Hospital , Sichuan University/ West China School of Nursing , Sichuan University , Chengdu , Sichuan 610000 , China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Aplastic anemia;
Malnutrition;
Risk factor
- From:
Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
2024;35(3):153-156
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the nutritional status in patients with aplastic anemia (AA), and to analyze the influencing factors. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 152 patients with AA admitted to West China Hospital between March 2019 and March 2022. The nutritional status of all patients was screened by Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002). According to the screening criteria, the patients were divided into control group (46 cases, total NRS2002 score <3 points) and malnutrition risk group (106 cases, total NRS2002 score ≥3 points). The body mass index (BMI), disease grading [severe AA (SAA), non-severe AA (NSAA)], levels of hemoglobin (Hb), serum albumin (Alb), serum ferritin (SF), total protein (TP), folic acid (FA), vitamin B12 (VB12), serum iron (SI), unsaturated iron binding capacity (UIBC) and transferrin saturation (TSAT) were recorded and compared between the two groups. The risk factors of malnutrition were analyzed by logistic regression analysis, and levels of the related influencing factors were compared. The association between nutritional risk and prognosis in patients with AA was analyzed. Results Among the 152 patients with AA, 69.74% of them were at risk of malnutrition. There was no significant difference in the BMI, TP, FA and VB12 between the malnutrition risk group and the control group (P>0.05). The proportion of SAA cases in the malnutrition risk group was significantly higher than that in the control group. The levels of Alb and UIBC in the malnutrition risk group were significantly lower than those in the control group, while the levels of SF, SI and TSAT were higher than those in the control group. In addition, the levels of SF, SI and TSAT in SAA patients were higher than those in NSAA group (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that high levels of SF, SI and TSAT, and high proportion of SAA cases were risk factors of malnutrition in AA patients (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse prognosis in the malnutrition risk group was significantly higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Patients with AA have a higher risk of malnutrition, and high levels of SF, SI and TSAT are risk factors for malnutrition. The greater the risk of malnutrition, the more severe the poor prognosis.
