No abstract available.
Tinnitus*

No abstract available.
Tinnitus*

No abstract available.
Tinnitus*

No abstract available.
Tinnitus*

No abstract available.
Noise* ; Tinnitus*

Humans ; Tinnitus

No abstract available.
Diagnosis* ; Tinnitus*

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the quality of tinnitus is very useful for understanding of the nature of tinnitus by non-sufferers including physicians. But tinntus matching with pure tone is a limited access to qualify tinnitus and frequently it is difficult for sufferer to match and this may be an important cause of low test-retest reliability. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study are to identify sounds mimicking tinnitus using generated and environmental sounds and its reliability on repeated tests. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 34 patients(M: 22, F: 12) who have suffered from continuous tinnitus were selected. Electronically generated sounds were pure tone, narrow band(1/3 octave band width) noise filtered from gaussian noise, random frequency band sine waves with center frequency. Twenty artificial and fourteen natural environmental sounds were recorded and calibrated. The most similar sound were selected by sufferer three times at the minimum time interval 2 weeks. The frequency spectrums of environmental sounds were analyzed. RESULTS: The most similar sounds mimicking tinnitus were pure tone(29.2%), frequency modulated sine wave(27.1%), natural environmental sounds(20.8%), narrow bane noise(14.6%), artificial environmental sounds(12.5%) in order. The reliability of the selection of the most similar sounds on repeated tests were very high(94.1%). The spectrum of the environmental sounds selected were broad. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of tinitus can be evaluated more objectively by electronically generated sounds which are highly reproducible. The quality of tinnitus is quite consistent. Also in the majority, the quality of tinnitus is different from the quality of pure tone.
Noise ; Tinnitus*

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The evaluation of tinnitus is becoming increasingly important in assessing the degree of disability. However, until now, there are no tools to verify the presence of tinnitus. The aim of this study was to identify the possibilities in discriminating the presence of tinnitus through tinnitus test, pitch match test and loudness balance test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Typically, 50 patients who have suffered from continuous tinnitus and 20 subjects with normal hearing ability who did not suffer from tinnitus were selected for the present investigation. All the patients underwent the tests for pitch match and loudness balance, which were replicated thrice with 1-minute intervals with a TDH 49 headphone and an oribiter model 922, GN otometrics in a soundproof room. Non-tinnitus group that didn't have tinnitus chose virtual tinnitus based on their own discretion. RESULTS: The most similar sounds mimicking tinnitus were of pure tone in both the groups. However, subjects of the tinnitus group were exposed to a greater variety of sounds than those of the non-tinnitus group. Moreover, the most common frequency of tinnitus was 4 and 8 kHz in the tinnitus group, but 1 kHz in the non-tinnitus group. The mean loudness of tinnitus was 7.28 dBSL in the tinnitus group and 13.6 dBSL in the non-tinnitus group. The loudness of tinnitus in the tinnitus group was less than that in the non-tinnitus group in a statistically significant manner (p<0.05). Loudness in each repeated tinnitus tests was identical in tinnitus group, but significantly different in non-tinnitus group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that repeated tinnitus tests for loudness matching were helpful in identifying the presence of tinnitus.
Hearing ; Humans ; Tinnitus

Humans ; Tinnitus ; diagnosis ; therapy