Objective. This is a cross-sectional study aimed to determine the time intervals from the first symptom to surgery of 37 patients with ovarian malignancies who underwent surgery at a tertiary government hospital from June to October 2019.

Methods. Structured interviews of patients and chart reviews were conducted to identify the intervals and the reasons behind such. The data were analyzed using Stata/SE 14.1, with the time intervals presented as medians and the reasons as frequencies. Multinomial logistic regression analysis established the association of time intervals with the extent of surgery and final stage of ovarian malignancies.

Results. The median Total Time Interval from the first symptom to surgery was 214 days. The longest delay was the Total System Interval (from the first visit at the tertiary hospital to surgery) with a median of 70 days. This was followed closely by Patient Interval (from the first symptom to consult with the initial physician) with a median of 64 days. A distant third was the Initial Physician Interval (from the consult with the initial physician to the first visit at the tertiary hospital) with a median of 29 days. Most common reasons for the delays were the patients not acknowledging the gravity of their condition for the Patient Interval; choice to go to other hospitals, distance and laboratory works or diagnostics for the Initial Physician Interval; waiting for laboratory work-ups for the First System Interval; and waiting for other departments' clearance for the Second System Interval. The most common first symptom was abdominal enlargement. The length of interval and the final stage (p=0.056 for Stage III and p=0.162 for Stage IV)) as well as extent of surgery (p=0.093) did not show significant association.

Conclusion. The time interval from first symptom to surgery showed a median of 214 days. The greatest delay is contributed by Total System Interval followed by Patient Interval due to varying reasons. Length of time intervals, however, was not found to be significantly associated with the extent of surgery and final stage

Time-to-Treatment

No abstract available.
Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy/*methods ; *Time-to-Treatment ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*surgery

BACKGROUND: Because of the high complication rate of anatomical reconstruction after periacetabular resection, the strategy of resection alone has been revisited. However, in terms of complications and functional outcome, whether resection hip arthroplasty (RHA) shows a superior result to that of pelvic ring reconstruction remains controversial. METHODS: We compared 24 RHAs and 16 pasteurized autograft-prosthesis composite (PPC) reconstructions regarding the complication rates, operative time, blood loss, and functional outcome. RESULTS: Compared to 16 PPC hips, 24 RHA hips showed lower major and minor complication rates (p < 0.001), shorter surgical time (p < 0.001), and superior Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores (p < 0.001). Of the 24 RHA hips, bony neo-acetabulum was identified in 7 on computed tomography and partial neo-acetabulum in 9; the remaining 8 had no bony acetabular structure. The average time to bony neo-acetabulum formation was 7 months (range, 4 to 13 months). CONCLUSIONS: RHA for periacetabular tumors can be an excellent alternative to anatomical reconstruction. It offers short surgical time, low complication rates, and functional results comparable to those of other reconstruction methods. However, this procedure is indicated for patients who can accept some limb shortening, and a tumor should be confined to the periacetabular area.
Acetabulum ; Arthroplasty* ; Extremities ; Hip* ; Humans ; Operative Time ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine the clinical and therapeutic characteristics of women with a primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was conducted to evaluate 22 women diagnosed with a PPC from 1993 to 2007 at the Hospitals of The Catholic University of Korea. Diagnoses were based on the Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria and clinical data. We collected patient clinicopathological data including age, presenting symptoms, pretreatment CA-125 values (U/ml), clinical stage (based on the FIGO stage), performance status (using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale), whether cytoreductive surgery was optimal or not, types of chemotherapy and response to treatment. We evaluated the clinical characteristics and response to treatment, time to treatment failure and overall survival. RESULTS: The median overall survival of all patients was 23.1 months. The estimated 3-year survival rate was 29% (SE, 13%). The response rate to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy was 79% and the median time to treatment failure was 9.9 months (95% confidence interval, 1.38~18.4 months). By univariate and multivariate analysis, performance status was the only significant factor associated with overall survival (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: We evaluated the clinical characteristics and treatment response of patients with a primary peritoneal carcinoma. Our results showed that it is possible to achieve long-term survival in patients with PPC. A further clinical study is to need to establish clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes.
Diagnosis ; Drug Therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Korea ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Time-to-Treatment ; Treatment Failure

Timing of surgery is important for prognosis. In patients with acute abdomen, the urgency means timing of surgery is even more important. However early emergency surgery is often logistically daunting because of constraints on resources such as operating room, supporting anesthesiologist, and nurses. Therefore it is worthwhile reviewing the timing of surgery in the patient with acute abdomen. The authors discuss the ideal time to surgery based on their experience and a review of the literature. For appendicitis and for peptic ulcer perforation, the authors recommend surgery within 24 hours from symptom onset. However, for other acute abdomen disease, evidence for a consensus is not as strong. If a surgeon faces a large number of emergent patients, if resources are limited, the surgeon must decide priorities for surgery. Therefore, an emergency triage system is needed, based on expert opinion and evidence. Although several triage systems are described in the literature, there is some controversy. If we follow a triage system, utilization of resources will be more efficient and acute care surgery might be performed within the ideal time.
Abdomen, Acute* ; Appendicitis ; Consensus ; Emergencies ; Expert Testimony ; Humans ; Operating Rooms ; Peptic Ulcer Perforation ; Prognosis ; Time Management ; Time-to-Treatment ; Triage

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the success rates of immediate and delayed placement of implants with respect to the causes of tooth extraction and implant positions.

METHODSA total of 310 dental implants (immediate implants:delayed implants = 76:234) were inserted into 80 patients. The types, sizes and positions of the implants and the causes of tooth extraction were recorded. We then investigated the relationship of implant loss with the causes of tooth extraction and placement methods.

RESULTSA higher failure rate was found for the implants in the posterior region of the maxilla, and when periodontitis was cited as a reason for tooth extraction. The overall success rates were 93.4% and 95.7% in the immediate and delayed implant placement groups, respectively, after a 2-year follow-up. No obvious relationship of success rate was observed with the implant placement method, cause of tooth extraction, and implants' position.

CONCLUSIONThe immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sockets could offer advantages over the delayed implant placement. It seems to be a safe and predictable method for patients.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Dental Implants ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Time Factors ; Tooth Extraction ; Treatment Failure ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo sum up our experience in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in ICU patient with severe brain injury.

METHODSBetween November 2011 and April 2014, PDTs were performed on 32 severe brain injury patients in ICU by a team of physicians and intensivists. The success rate, efficacy, safety, and complications including stomal infection and bleeding, paratracheal insertion, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, tracheal laceration, as well as clinically significant tracheal stenosis were carefully monitored and recorded respectively.

RESULTSThe operations took 4-15 minutes (mean 9.1 minutes ± 4.2 minutes). Totally 4 cases suffered from complications in the operations: 3 cases of stomal bleeding, and 1 case of intratracheal bloody secretion, but none required intervention. Paratracheal insertion, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, tracheal laceration, or clinically significant tracheal stenosis were not found in PDT patients. There was no procedure-related death occurring during or after PDT.

CONCLUSIONOur study demonstrats that PDT is a safe, highly effective, and minimally invasive procedure. The appropriate sedation and airway management perioperatively help to reduce complication rates. PDT should be performed or supervised by a team of physicians with extensive experience in this procedure, and also an intensivist with experience in difficult airway management.

Brain Injuries ; therapy ; Critical Care ; Humans ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Tracheostomy ; methods ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo explore the relationship between hyperhomocysteinemia (H-Hcy) and long-term outcome of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in a single centre.

METHODSA total of 1 408 consecutive patients implanted with DES in our department between March 2011 and January 2013 were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were stratified into H-Hcy (Hcy≥10 µmol/L, n=798, 56.7%) and non-H-Hcy group (Hcy<10 µmol/L, n=610, 43.3%). The clinical characteristics, coronary artery lesions, SYNTAX score and 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTSCompared with non-H-Hcy group, coronary artery stenosis was severer as shown by higher diseased arteries (2.11±0.87 vs. 1.91±0.82, P<0.001), higher incidence of three diseased arteries (39.7% vs. 29.5%, P<0.001) and higher SYNTAX score (36.99±29.66 vs. 27.39±22.70, P=0.001) in H-Hcy group. The 1-year incidence of MACCE was also higher in H-Hcy group compared with non-H-Hcy group(18.4% vs. 8.9%, P<0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that diabetes mellitus (OR=1.530, 95%CI 1.142-2.050, P=0.004), age (OR=1.065, 95%CI 1.038-1.093; P<0.001), and Hcy (OR=1.019, 95%CI 1.005-1.033, P=0.009) are the independent predictors for 1-year MACCE.

CONCLUSIONHigh Hcy level is correlated with the severity of coronary artery stenosis, and serves as an independent predictor of MACCE after stenting in CAD patients.

Coronary Artery Disease ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; Homocysteine ; Humans ; Prospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

Transfer of patients with severe burn injury is an important issue during the rescue of mass casualties, as it may give rise to great influence on the prognosis of patients. Timing of transfer, preparation before transfer, and details for attention are elaborated in this article, aiming to further specify the procedures of transfer of patients with burn injury.
Burns ; therapy ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prognosis ; Time Factors ; Transportation of Patients ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo compare the clinical safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in octogenarians. Methods Studies comparing laparoscopic colorectal resection with open colorectal resection in octogenarians were identified from the Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane databases from 1990 to 2012. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed to determine studies suitable for inclusion. Meta-analysis was performed by fixed or random effects model.

RESULTSFive observational studies with a total of 685 patients (330 laparoscopic colorectal resections and 355 open colorectal resections) were identified. Laparoscopic colorectal resection was associated with a prolonged operative time (WMD=27.89, P<0.01) and a lower rate of overall complications (OR=0.58, P<0.01), wound infection (OR=0.50, P<0.05), cardiovascular complication(OR=0.53, P<0.05), quicker bowel function return (WMD=-0.83, P<0.01), and shorter length of hospital stay (WMD=-3.60, P<0.05). No differences were found with regard to anastomotic leak (OR=1.13, P>0.05), prolonged ileus (OR=0.71, P>0.05), respiratory complication (OR=0.59, P>0.05),mortality (OR=0.67, P>0.05), and reoperation (OR=0.85, P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONLaparoscopic colorectal resection is as safe as open colorectal resection, and is more favorable in terms of length of hospital stay and bowel function return in octogenarians.

Aged, 80 and over ; Anastomotic Leak ; Colectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Operative Time ; Treatment Outcome