When a revision surgery related with removal of failed interbody cage is required, going through the previous passage can lead to a higher risk of neurological deficits or incidental dural injuries. Recently, the lateral approach has become a popular method instead of the conventional anterior or posterior approaches. The lateral approach is also useful method to remove failed interbody cage previously placed and re-do interbody fusion with lower risks compared to revision surgery via previous passage. However, there is still some difficulty in retrieving the interbody cage from the intervertebral space because of no spacious passage, subsidence, and uncontrolled movable cage. In this study, we introduce our experience that we removed failed interbody cage more easily with only the simple additional steps of making a taphole and fixing the cage using a thread-tipped stick.
Device Removal ; Methods ; Reoperation

For undercorrected esotropia after bilateral medial rectus(MR) recession, we performed unilateral or bilateral MR rerecession, unilateral rerecession or marginal myotomy of the recessed medial rectus muscle combined with lateral rectus(LR) resection, or unilateral LR resection. The correction of deviation was 15 delta in unilateral 2.0mm MR rerecession. Bilateral 2.0mm MR rerecession corrected 20 to 25 delta of esodeviation, but undercorrection was noted in one case. With unilateral 2.0mm rerecession or marginal myotomy of the recessed medial rectus muscle combined with 5.5mm or 8.0mm LR resection, the correction of deviation was 26 to 29 delta, and there was no under- or overcorrection. The corrective effect of this procedure was therefore greater and more stable than that of bilateral 2.0mm MR rerecession. Unilateral 8.0mm LR resection performed 3 months after bilateral MR recession showed correction of 15 delta, whereas the same procedure performed 3 weeks after bilateral MR rerecession showed correction of 24 delta. Unilateral LR resection procedure seems to be more efficacious for residual esotropia if performed as soos as possible within 3 months after sufficient bilateral MR recession or rerecession.
Esotropia* ; Methods ; Reoperation

Over the past several decades, liver transplantation has experienced remarkable advances in surgical techniques, including venovenous bypass, piggyback method without venovenous bypass, piggyback method with cavaplasty, living-related liver transplantation, splitting liver transplantation, cluster organ transplantation, and liver retransplantation. Based on his experience on 582 case of liver transplantation, the author reviews these techniques and discusses their advantages and disadvantages.
Humans ; Liver Transplantation ; methods ; trends ; Living Donors ; Reoperation

We report here a case of a kidney transplant recipient in whom the ureter was initially implanted into the peritoneum. Excessive ultrafiltration volume and reversal of serum vs dialysate creatinine ratio when the patient was recommenced on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis first suggested the diagnosis which was subsequently confirmed by a plain abdominal x-ray demonstrating placement of ureteric stent in the peritoneum. This rare complication was successfully corrected with surgical re-implantation of ureter into the bladder and 5 years later, the patient remains well with good graft function.
Cadaver ; Kidney Transplantation/*methods ; Postoperative Complications ; Reoperation ; Replantation ; Ureter/*surgery

BACKGROUNDSevere acetabular bone deficiency is a major challenge in acetabular revision surgery. Most cases require reconstruction of the acetabulum with bone grafting and a reinforcement device. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of this procedure for severe acetabular bone deficiency in acetabular revision surgery.

METHODSThis study involved 12 patients (2 males and 10 females) with severe acetabular bone defects who underwent implantation of a reinforcement device (ring or cage) and bone grafting between February 2003 and October 2008. Using the Paprosky classification, 2 cases were Paprosky IIC, 6 were IIIA, and 4 were IIIB. The mean age at the time of surgery was 63.0 years (range, 46 - 78 years). During revision surgery, a reinforcement ring was implanted in 6 patients, and a cage in 6 patients. The clinical and radiographic results were evaluated retrospectively. The mean duration of follow-up was 37 months (range, 9 - 71 months).

RESULTSThe average Harris Hip Score improved from 35.2 preoperatively to 82.9 at the time of the final follow-up visit. The results were excellent in 8 hips (66.7%), good in 2 (16.7%), and fair in 2 (16.7%). Osteolysis was found in 1 case, but did not worsen. Three patients had yellow wound effusion, with healing after administration of dressing changes, debridement, and antibiotics. Dislocation occurred in a 62-year-old woman. Closed reduction was performed, and dislocation did not recur. There was no evidence of intraoperative acetabular fracture, nerve injury, ectopic ossification, aseptic loosening, or infection.

CONCLUSIONReconstruction with a reinforcement device and bone grafting is an effective approach to the treatment of acetabular bone deficiency in acetabular revision surgery, given proper indications and technique.

Acetabulum ; surgery ; Aged ; Bone Transplantation ; methods ; Female ; Hip ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reoperation ; methods

OBJECTIVETo investigate a safe method for correcting the secondary deformity after reduction mammaplasty.

METHODSA periareolar incision or original incision was done and the wedge-shaped glandular tissues were removed inferior-laterally in 11 patients.

RESULTS10 cases obtained the satisfactory results. One patient underwent the third operation 6 months after because of the obvious scar, and the result was yet unsatisfactory 1 year later.

CONCLUSIONSNo matter which pedicle was used in the first reduction mammaplasty, a periareolar incision or original incision with wedge-shaped glandular tissue resection is a safe method for repeated reduction mammaplasty.

Breast ; abnormalities ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty ; adverse effects ; methods ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; surgery ; Reoperation

OBJECTIVETo summarize the experience of liver retransplantation for patients with poor graft function.

METHODSThe clinical data of 9 patients undergone liver retransplantation at our center from April 1993 to April 2005 were retrospectively analyzed. The main indications for liver retransplantation at our center were early hepatic artery thrombosis (2/9), early portal vein thrombosis (1/9), and biliary tract complication (6/9). Of the 9 patients received liver retransplantation with cadaveric allografts, 3 received classic orthotopic liver transplantation, and 6 piggyback liver transplantation. Roux-en-Y biliary tract reconstruction was performed in 6 patients, Donor spleen vein was used as a conduit between donor portal vein and recipient portal vein in 1, and donor spleen artery as a conduit between donor hepatic artery and recipient aorta in 1.

RESULTSNo perioperative mortality occurred. Of them, 5 had no complications after the operation, 1 had stricture in anastomotic stoma of portal vein, and 3 died in 6 months after the operation.

CONCLUSIONSPoor graft function due to biliary tract complications and vessel complications after primary liver transplantation are the chief indications of liver retransplantation. Liver retransplantation is the only suitable treatment of poor graft function.

Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Transplantation ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Transplantation, Homologous

PURPOSE: To introduce and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of interrupted buried suture using non-absorbable material in involutional lower lid entropion. METHODS: A total of 105 adult involutional lower lid entropion patients (135 eyes) from January 2010 to January 2015 with or without the horizontal laxity, and without a history of previous surgical treatment were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with cicatricial entropion, epiblepharon, history of previous lower lid surgery, and follow-up period less than 3 months. The central and lateral areas below the lower lid margin and below the inferior tarsal margin were connected by non-absorbable interrupted buried suture. Results were analyzed by objective outcome using measurements from clinical photographs, subjective outcome using improvements of patients' symptom and cosmetic satisfactions. RESULTS: This study included 135 eyelids. Pre-operative distraction test revealed horizontal laxity in 37 eyes (27.4%). The mean age was 79.50 years and the mean period of follow-up was 34.51 ± 3.8 months. In 133 eyelids (98.5%), post-operative lid positions have everted. Score of symptom improvements were 9.44 (0 to 10 scale). 99 patients (94.3%) were cosmetically satisfied. No surgical complications were observed. Although we had two recurred cases (1.5%), one with horizontal laxity (2.7%) and one without horizontal laxity (1.0%), reoperation was not performed due to mild subjective discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with involutional entropion regardless of horizontal laxity, a simple interrupted buried suture method using non-absorbable suture material showed excellent long term results in very low recurrence rate and high cosmetic satisfaction.
Adult ; Blepharoplasty ; Entropion* ; Eyelids ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Methods* ; Recurrence ; Reoperation ; Sutures*

The use of acetabular cup revision arthroplasty is on the rise as demands for total hip arthroplasty, improved life expectancies, and the need for individual activity increase. For an acetabular cup revision to be successful, the cup should gain stable fixation within the remaining supportive bone of the acetabulum. Since the patient's remaining supportive acetabular bone stock plays an important role in the success of revision, accurate classification of the degree of acetabular bone defect is necessary. The Paprosky classification system is most commonly used when determining the location and degree of acetabular bone loss. Common treatment options include: acetabular liner exchange, high hip center, oblong cup, trabecular metal cup with augment, bipolar cup, bulk structural graft, cemented cup, uncemented cup including jumbo cup, acetabular reinforcement device (cage), trabecular metal cup cage. The optimal treatment option is dependent upon the degree of the discontinuity, the amount of available bone stock and the likelihood of achieving stable fixation upon supportive host bone. To achieve successful acetabular cup revision, accurate evaluation of bone defect preoperatively and intraoperatively, proper choice of method of acetabular revision according to the evaluation of acetabular bone deficiency, proper technique to get primary stability of implant such as precise grafting technique, and stable fixation of implant are mandatory.
Acetabulum* ; Arthroplasty ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Classification ; Hip ; Hip Prosthesis ; Life Expectancy ; Methods ; Reoperation ; Transplants

BACKGROUND: The breast reconstruction using implant has been conducted widely. Many studies were presented to analyze the complications, but most of these studies were conducted with patients relatively short term period follow up. The authors studied with patients who were followed up at least five years. METHODS: Among the patients who were underwent breast reconstruction with implant from 1998 to 2007, 37 patients who met were followed up more than 5 years were selected in the study. Relationships between factors such as the operation methods, volume, type of surfaces of the implants, etc. and the complication rate or reoperation rate were analyzed. The level of satisfactory scoring was measured by patients' and 5 plastic surgeons. RESULTS: Complications were developed in 21 patients (65.6%) and 9 of them underwent reoperations. Infection was most common cause of complication. Implant removal was conducted to 7 patients, and 5 of them due to infection. The percentages of patients who received postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy in complication group and implant removal group were higher than the whole group whereas such correlation was not statistically significant. Direct Implant insertion has 50% of complication and 80% in permanent expander insertion and 73.7% of expanderimplant exchange. The average value of subjective score at last follow up was 4.2 points and the average value of objective score was 5.74. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate of complications was relatively high, and the final followup satisfaction score was low. This study should be helpful not only to select reconstruction methods, but also further studies to compare with other reconstruction methods.
Breast* ; Drug Therapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies* ; Humans ; Incidence ; Mammaplasty* ; Methods ; Radiotherapy ; Reoperation ; Tissue Expansion