1.Is VBAC(Vaginal Birth After Cesarean) Really Safe?.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2005;48(5):489-500
No abstract available.
Parturition*
2.Creating Active and Gentle Birth Culture.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2001;44(2):117-126
No abstract available.
Parturition*
3.Selection Tendencies of the Lamaze Class : a Prepared Childbirth Program.
Chung N LEE ; Yong Min KIM ; In Soon SHIN ; Woo Yeon CHO ; Jeong Hwan KIM
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;43(9):1517-1524
No abstract available.
Parturition*
4.Head circumference alone at birth, is it practical?.
Korean Journal of Pediatrics 2014;57(2):72-74
No abstract available.
Head*
;
Parturition*
5.A study about difference of season of birth in positive and negative schizophrenics.
Song LEE ; Doo Byung PARK ; Kil Hong LEE
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 1993;32(3):350-359
No abstract available.
Parturition*
;
Seasons*
6.The Onset of Air Breathing at Birth and Control of Breathing.
Korean Journal of Perinatology 2005;16(2):103-109
No abstract available.
Parturition*
;
Respiration*
7.Renal trauma on horseshoe kidney, 2 cases.
Hyeon Hoe KIM ; Cheol Hee LEE ; Woon Chang CHOI ; Jong Bouk LEE ; Jung Chul YUN
Korean Journal of Urology 1993;34(5):938-942
It has been suggested that diseased and anomalous kidneys are more susceptible to injury. While horseshoe kidney is the most common congenital anomaly of renal fusion, occurring in about one in every 400-500 births, reports of the horseshoe kidneys associated with renal trauma are rare. Herewe now report our experiences with two cases of renal trauma on horseshoe kidney.
Kidney*
;
Parturition
8.Various Methods of Childbirth.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2001;44(2):144-153
No abstract available.
Methods*
;
Parturition*
9.Role of Obstetrician to reduce Birth Asphyxia.
Korean Journal of Perinatology 2003;14(4):379-384
No abstract available.
Asphyxia*
;
Parturition*
10.A Systematic Review of Birth Experience Assessment Instrument.
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing 2017;23(4):221-232
PURPOSE: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and to describe characteristics of the birth experience assessment instrument. METHODS: Literature related to the development of the birth experience assessment instrument was examined using a systematic review method. A literature search was conducted using the keywords as ‘[normal birth]; [satisfac* OR care quality]; [instrument OR scale] AND (development)’ through PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, and RISS. The search used quality appraisal through QUADAS (Quality Assessment of studies of Diagnostic Accuracy included Systemic reviews) yielding 17 records. RESULTS: The birth experience assessment instrument was categorized for instrumental characteristics: birth satisfaction (n=8), perception of labor experience (n=5), and birth care quality assessment in normal and operative birth experiences (n=4). Important key elements for content characteristics were as follows: nursing practice (n=10), pain control (n=5), environment (n=5), participation (n=4), and support (n=4). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the birth experience instrument is appropriate for measuring quality of birth care in various clinical conditions. This review of the birth experience instrument reports that an appropriate psychometric tool for enhancing quality of birth care is important.
Methods
;
Nursing
;
Parturition*
;
Psychometrics
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail