1.Early postoperative results with EEA stapler in total gastrectomy.
Yeung Jin PARK ; Hae Wan LEE ; Kuhn Uk LEE ; Jin Pok KIM
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1993;44(4):534-541
No abstract available.
Gastrectomy*
2.The complications of roux-en-Y end-to end esophagojejunostomy by EEA stapler after total gastrectomy.
Chul HAN ; Soo Myong OH ; Hoong Zae JOO
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1991;41(6):727-733
No abstract available.
Gastrectomy*
3.Iatrogenic intramural esophageal dissection secondary to insertion of nasogastric tubes and the transorally inserted anvil during robot-assisted total gastrectomy.
Hyea Hyoung CHO ; Hyeon Ju SHIN ; Sung Uk CHOI ; Seung Zhoo YOON ; Hye Won LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2012;63(3):284-285
No abstract available.
Gastrectomy
4.Total gastrectomy for gastro-cardiac cancer.
Gi Soo GOO ; Sung Joon KWON ; Kwang Soo LEE
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1992;43(2):167-175
No abstract available.
Gastrectomy*
6.Jejunal pouch as a gastric reservoir after total gastrectomy.
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1991;40(2):153-157
No abstract available.
Gastrectomy*
7.Usefulness of Additional Prone pad compression Study in Upper Gastrointestinal Series for Detecting EarlyGastric Cancer.
Han Na NOH ; Hyun Kwon HA ; Sang Jin BAE ; Soo Youn HAM ; Jong Hwa LEE ; Pyeo Myun KIM ; Moon Gyu LEE ; Yong Ho AUH
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1998;39(4):749-756
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of prone pad study in upper gastrointestinal series(UGIS) for thedetection of early gastric cancer(EGC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: During an eight-month period, 88 of 170 patientswho underwent gastrectomy due to EGC were also the subjects of prone pad study as well as double contrast(n=92),mucosal relief(n=76), or compression(n=91) studies. The EGCs were single in 84 patients and double in four. Wecompared prone pad study with the three other techniques for detecting a tumor and depicting the surroundingmucosal changes. Lesional conspicuity was rated 'complete', 'incomplete','suspicious'. or 'undetected'. Thedepiction of surrounding mucosal change was rated 'excellent', 'good', 'fair', or 'poor'. RESULTS: Mean tumorsize was 3.2cm, with a range of 0.3-9cm. Tumors were located in the antrum(n=55), angle(n=13), lower or midbody(n=16), or the sign body and cardia(n=5). Among the 92 EGCs evaluated, UGIS missed the lesion in threecases(sensitivity, 97%). The rates of 'complete' lesional conspicuity were 49% inn prone pad, 29% in compression,20% in double contrast, and 9% in mucosal relief. The rates of excellent' in depicting surrounding mucosal changewere 45% in prone pad, 11% in double contrast, 9% in mucosal relief, and 9% in compression. The tumor wasdemonstrated only in prone pad study in five(5%) of the 92 EGCs. CONCLUSION: prone pad study during UGIS improvesboth the detection rate of EGC and the depiction of mucosal change around the tumor.
Gastrectomy
;
Humans
8.Endoscopic Examination in Patients following Gastrectomy.
Yong Taek CHUN ; In Sik CHUNG ; Ahn Kie LEE ; Kyu Won CHUNG ; Hee Sik SUN ; Boo Sung KIM ; Whan Kook CHUNG
Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1984;4(1):13-19
It had heen emphasized the necessity for upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations in patients. Who has had gastrectomy and presents persisting gastrointestinal symptoms. This study was conducted to evaluate endoscopic findings and clinical symptoms in patients following gastrectomy. (continue...)
Gastrectomy*
;
Humans
9.A retrospective study of concervative patients treated with total gastrectomy at the department of surgery, EUL JI medical center in daejeon city during 10 years from september 1990.
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1993;45(2):193-198
No abstract available.
Gastrectomy*
;
Humans
;
Retrospective Studies*
10.Clinical analysis according to reconstructive type after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Seung Ho CHOI ; Sung Hoon NOH ; Jin Sik MIN ; Kyong Sik LEE ; Chun Koo KIM
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1991;41(6):734-743
No abstract available.
Gastrectomy*
;
Stomach Neoplasms*
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail