OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the day of delivery for women with regular menstrual history was predicted best from the last menstrual period (LMP), crown rump length (CRL) and or biparietal diameter (BPD). METHODS: All of 561 women had estimated the day of delivery by LMP, CRL in the first trimester (In case of 217 women, it was available) and BPD in the second trimester. The accuracy of each method in predicting the day of delivery was determined. Those who were delivered after the spontaneous onset of labor were included. Differences among these methods were evaluated with nonparametric tests. RESULTS: The percentage of women who delivered within 3 days of the estimated day of delivery was 254(45.3%) and 216(38.5%) of the women with pregnancies by BPD and LMP, respectively. And within 7days of the estimated day were 408(72.7%), 390(69.5%) of the women from BPD and the LMP. In the women, the BPD estimate was significantly better predictor within the 7days of the day of delivery than LMP estimate (p=0.027). Compared to LMP estimate, CRL and BPD estimates seemed to be advanced the day of delivery about 2.6 days in CRL, and 0.9 days in BPD (p=0.004, p=0.034). But we could not find any advantage of the CRL measurement in first trimester than single BPD measurement in the second trimester for the predictor of the day of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: When the difference between the methods in predicting the day of delivery was less than 7 days, the BPD measurement was better than the last menstrual period.
Biometry* ; Crown-Rump Length ; Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Pregnancy Trimester, Second ; Ultrasonography

Individual identification is one of the research hotspots in the practice of forensic science, and the judgment is usually built on the comparison of the unique biological characteristics of the individual, such as fingerprints, iris and DNA. With the dramatic increase in the number of cases related to video image investigations, there is an increasing need for the technology to identify individuals based on the macroscopic comparison of facial appearance biometrics. At present, with the introduction of computer three-dimensional (3D) modeling and 3D superimposition comparison technology, considerable progress has been made in individual identification methods based on macroscopic comparison of facial appearance biometrics. This paper reviews individual facial appearance biometric methods based on macroscopical comparison, comprehensively analyzes the advantages and limitations of different methods, and puts forward recommendations and prospects for subsequent research.
Biometric Identification ; Biometry/methods* ; Face/anatomy & histology* ; Forensic Sciences/methods* ; Humans

No abstract available.
Biometry* ; Rheology* ; Umbilical Arteries*

PURPOSE: To compare and evaluate device efficacy using white-to-white (WTW) diameter measurements by IOLMaster(R), Lenstar(R), Orbscan II(R), and a manual method with anterior segment photographs in normal eyes. METHODS: Three sets of WTW diameter measurements were obtained from 62 normal eyes of 31 patients, using the Orbscan II(R), Lenstar(R), IOLMaster(R), and a manual method with anterior segment photographs. Repeatability of each device was evaluated by coefficient of variation. ANOVA and Pearson's correlation were used to compare the differences among the devices. Bland Altman plot was performed to assess measurement agreement among the devices. RESULTS: The mean WTW distance was 11.79 +/- 0.46 mm with Orbscan II(R), 12.05 +/- 0.38 mm with Lenstar(R), 12.15 +/- 0.36 mm with IOLMaster(R), and 12.30 +/- 0.40 mm with a manual method. There were significant differences in the results among the methods (ANOVA, p < 0.05). There were significant correlations between the devices except Orbscan II(R) (Pearson's correlation, r > 0.8, p < 0.05). The coefficient of variation of Orbscan II(R) was larger than those of Lenstar(R) and IOLMaster(R). CONCLUSIONS: The WTW measurement using Orbscan II(R) has low correlations with other devices and lower repeatability. Our findings suggest that partial coherence interferometry should be considered as a new standard.
Biometry ; Eye ; Humans ; Interferometry

This paper summarized the internal and external development of medical metrology, posed its main problem and studied its development trend.
Biometry ; Epidemiologic Measurements

OBJECTIVEThe Chinese Journal of Hepatology is a key journal in the research field of liver diseases in China. Ranked by the impact factor, which was issued and used by the Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, it is in fourth position among medical journals in China. In order to evaluate the journal, some facts about it were surveyed, including the number of pages, the number of papers in each issue, organizations of the authors, funding for their works, the impact factor, immediacy index, statuses of the articles' references, and a listing of their being cited.

METHODSThe number of pages of each issue, the number of papers in every volume, and citations were quantitatively analyzed. Funding, impact factor, immediacy index, citations and organizations of the authors were analyzed by weighted Rank Sum Ratio (RSRw).

RESULTSIn the five years, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003, (1) The Chinese authors came from 26 of the 31 provinces and cities in China. 48.8% in 1999 to 71.7% in 2003 of the authors were working in medical universities or medical colleges, and some authors were overseas experts. (2) The number of articles cited in the five years were 702, 1158, 1087, 1178 and 1744. (3) The number of papers published were 248, 221, 242, 212 and 336. (4) Impact factors of the journal were 0.897, 0.931, 1.421, 1.858, 1.440. With the cites, immediacy index, cited rate, ratios of research provided by national or international funds and number of organizations of authors evaluated, the RSRw results of the five years were 0.2750, 0.3417, 0.5000, 0.5000 and 0.5000.

CONCLUSIONThe Chinese Journal of Hepatology is well-known and is one of the highest academic quality medical journals in China. It reflects the progress of liver disease research in China.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relation between ocular biometry and anthropometric parameters in Korean adults with cataracts METHODS: The preoperative medical data of 150 eyes (150 patients) who underwent cataract surgery from November 2015 to March 2016. Anthropometric parameters include height, weight and body mass index (BMI). Ocular biometry includes axial length, anterior chamber depth, corneal curvature, lens thickness and central corneal thickness. The relation between ocular biometry and anthropometric parameters was evaluated using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean age was 67.44 ± 10.83 years. The mean height, weight and BMI were 157.24 ± 9.16 cm, 60.50 ± 10.18 kg and 24.47 ± 3.59 kg/m2. The mean axial length, anterior chamber depth, corneal curvature, lens thickness and central corneal thickness were 23.51 ± 0.80 mm, 3.23 ± 0.42 mm, 44.49 ± 1.33 diopter, 4.44 ± 0.42 mm and 534.64 ± 31.90 µm. The height showed a significant positive relationship with axial length and anterior chamber depth and a significant negative relationship with average corneal curvature. However, there was no significant relationship with the central corneal thickness or lens thickness. The weight showed significant positive relationship with axial length. BMI was not related to any anthropometric parameters. Age showed a significant positive relationship with average corneal curvature and lens thickness and a negative relationship with height and anterior chamber depth. CONCLUSIONS: As height increases, the axial length and the anterior chamber depth increase and the corneal curvature become flatter. As age increases, the anterior chamber depth becomes shallower, the corneal curvature becomes steeper and the lens thickness increases.
Adult* ; Anterior Chamber ; Biometry* ; Body Height ; Body Mass Index ; Body Weight ; Cataract* ; Cornea ; Humans ; Linear Models

PURPOSE: To investigate clinical availability of AL-Scan(TM) (Nidek, Gamagori, Japan) by comparing corneal refractive power with AL-Scan(TM), Autokeratometer(TM) (Topcon KR-1, Tokyo, Japan) and Pentacam(TM) (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) devices. METHODS: Seventy-one patients (142 eyes) who visited our hospital for refractive surgery were tested using AL-Scan(R), Autokeratometer and Pentacam(R) and corneal refractive power was compared among devices. RESULTS: When comparing measurements with AL-Scan(R), Autokeratometer and Pentacam(R), the mean corneal refractive power was 43.37 +/- 1.32 D (2.4 mm zone), 43.35 +/- 1.32 D (3.3 mm zone), 43.36 +/- 1.35 D, and 43.35 +/- 1.36 D respectively and showed no significant differences. Corneal refractive power had strongly positive linear correlation (p < 0.001) and Bland-Altman plots showed high degree of agreement among AL-Scan(R), Autokeratometer and Pentacam(R) devices. CONCLUSIONS: Because measuring ocular biometry with AL-Scan(R) including axial length, intraocular lens power calculation and topography simultaneously is possible, clinical use is convenient. Corneal refractive power was not different when compared with autokeratometer and Pentacam(R) devices, thus, AL-Scan(R) can be used in the clinical environment.
Biometry ; Humans ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Refractive Surgical Procedures

PURPOSE: To compare axial length, anterior chamber depth, and keratometric measurements of an optical low-coherence reflectometry device with those of other ocular biometry devices and evaluate the accuracy of predicting postoperative refraction. METHODS: A total of 32 eyes in 32 patients who received cataract surgery were included in the present study. The axial length, anterior chamber depth, and keratometry were measured by optical low-coherence reflectometry (Lenstar LS900(R)), partial coherence interferometry (IOL master(R)), and ultrasound. The SRK/T formula was used to calculate IOL power, and predictive error that subtracts predictive refraction from postoperative refraction was compared among ocular biometry devices. RESULTS: Axial length, anterior chamber depth, and keratometry had a strong correlation and demonstrated no statistically significant differences between Lenstar LS900(R) and other devices. The Bland-Altman plots showed a high degree of agreement between Lenstar LS900(R) and other devices. The mean absolute prediction errors in Lenstar LS900(R) and IOL master(R) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The ocular biometric measurements and prediction of postoperative refraction using Lenstar LS900(R) were as accurate as IOL master(R) and ultrasound.
Anterior Chamber ; Biometry ; Cataract ; Eye ; Humans ; Interferometry

PURPOSE: To compare ocular biometry measured using 4 applanation ultrasonographic biometry devices and evaluate the accuracies of the refractive outcomes after cataract surgery. METHODS: A total of 60 eyes in 60 patients who received cataract surgery were included in the present study. The axial length was measured using applanation ultrasonographic biometry devices (Aviso(R), Hi-Scan(R), UD-6000(R), P37-II(R)). Additionally, keratometry was measured using an autokeratometer (Topcon KR 8000) and the SRK/T formula was used to calculate intraocular lens (IOL) power. Two months after cataract surgery, the refractive outcome was determined, and results from the 4 different applanation ultrasonographic biometry devices were compared. RESULTS: Axial lengths were 23.52 +/- 1.45 mm, 23.51 +/- 1.04 mm, 23.54 +/- 1.58 mm, and 23.52 +/- 1.38 mm measured using Aviso(R), Hi-Scan(R), UD-6000(R), and P37-II(R), respectively with no statistically significant differences observed (p = 0.92). The mean absolute error (MAE) of the Aviso(R), Hi-Scan(R), UD-6000(R), and P37-II(R) was 0.41 +/- 0.32 diopter (D), 0.40 +/- 0.30 D, 0.36 +/- 0.26 D, and 0.39 +/- 0.26 D, respectively. The mean numerical error (MNE) was 0.39 +/- 0.37 D, 0.36 +/- 0.32 D, 0.26 +/- 0.29 D, and 0.38 +/- 0.32 D, respectively. The differences between the 4 different applanation ultrasonographic biometry devices were not statistically significant (p = 0.90, p = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The ocular biometric measurements and prediction of postoperative refraction using Aviso(R), Hi-Scan(R), UD-6000(R), P37-II(R) showed no significant differences.
Biometry* ; Cataract ; Humans ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Refractive Errors