BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Type II Diabetes Mellitus remains a pressing public health concern among Filipino adults, particularly prevalent in urban households belonging to the middle to richest wealth population. As body composition influences glucose metabolism, understanding the potential of anthropometric parameters is vital in predicting fasting blood sugar. This study aims to generate and find the most appropriate model that can detect likelihood of elevated FBS using different anthropometric parameters.

The data set from 2018-2019, 2021 Expanded National Nutrition Survey of Department of Science and Technology - Food and Nutrition Research Institute, consisting of 14,655 adults aged 18–65 years from 33 highly urbanized cities (HUCs) was used in this study. While controlling for study variables, multiple logistic regression was used to determine significant predictors affecting the fasting blood sugar (FBS) status of these adults.

The above normal status of each anthropometric parameter, in the models for BMI (aOR=2.33; pCONCLUSION

There is no single anthropometric parameter that can truly discern the status of elevated FBS. However, it appears the use of waist circumference and waist-hip ratio have the potential to be an indicator especially in settings where the evaluation of the actual FBS of the individuals is not feasible. Future research suggests exploring possible interaction of BP, and FBS, diet quality and adequacy, and the effectiveness of having multiple anthropometric parameters in one model.

INTRODUCTION

Patients with diabetes are at higher risk of developing severe COVID-19 infection with a two-fold increased risk of mortality. This study described the risk factors affecting clinical outcomes of confirmed COVID-19 patients with diabetes mellitus at the University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines.

This retrospective study included 204 patients with COVID-19 (34 with known type 2 diabetes and 2 with new-onset diabetes) from March to October 2020. Clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters were collected and analyzed in subjects with diabetes. A univariate logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the patient’s risk factors associated with mortality or poor prognosis.

Moderate COVID-19 infection occurred in 52.8% of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and critical COVID-19 infection in 27.8%. All patients with critical COVID-19 infection presented with acute respiratory distress syndrome, half had concomitant septic shock and respiratory failure was observed in 27.8%. The average length of hospital stay was approximately 17.5 days. T2DM patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are 5.1 times (95% CI 1.2 to 21.4) more likely to develop severe or critical COVID-19 infection, and more likely to stay in the hospital for more than 14 days. HbA1c >8.5% is a potential risk (OR = 3.7, 0.6 to 21.6) for severe to critical disease. T2DM patients with concomitant coronary artery disease are 7.6 times (95% CI 1.3 to 43.4) more likely to stay longer (more than 14 days) as compared to those without existing coronary artery disease. Prior statin use was a significant risk factor for ICU admission (p-value 0.0341). Other potential risk factors affecting clinical outcomes are obesity (OR 3, 0.4 to 22.7), prior use of thiazolidinedione (OR 7.8, 0.5 to 126.7) or sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (OR 7.5, 0.4 to 145) and prior use of anti-thrombotic (OR 4.6, 0.4 to 56.8). The recovery rate of T2DM patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection was 86.1%.

Patients with T2DM are more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection. The presence of established ASCVD increases the likelihood of severe COVID-19 disease as well as longer length of hospital stay for more than 14 days. Early recognition and prompt treatment led to a favorable recovery rate.

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is the most common type of diabetes in the Philippines. Diabetic foot complications represent a prevalent and significant chronic concern for individuals with type 2 diabetes. This poses an immediate community health concern, as diabetic complications may threaten an individual's well-being.

This study intends to cross-culturally adapt the Diabetic Foot Knowledge Subscale (DFKS) and Foot Self-Care Behavior Scale (FSCBS) questionnaires into the Filipino language as an assessment tool among Filipinos with diabetes.

The study employed a psychometric research design, where it entailed Phase A and Phase B. Phase A involved the forward translation of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires, followed by the synthesis of the translations and backward translation. Subsequently, an expert committee reviewed the translations and concluded the final version. The final translated versions of the questionnaires ensured that it can be understood by an individual who has a Grade 6 level of reading proficiency. Phase B entailed the validity testing with the evaluation of the expert committee, and reliability testing of the said questionnaires with a sample size of 30 participants. A wash-out period of 24 hours was given for the test-retest reliability, followed by data analysis. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were measured using the item and scale content validity indices and the internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively, to ensure their accuracy and appropriateness. The content validity of the questionnaires was evaluated individually by the experts using a Likert scale from 1-4, with 4 being the highest meaning the item was very relevant and succinct. Scores per item were between 3 and 4, which indicate that the translated version of the items were relevant and succinct or were relevant but needed minor revisions.

The validity scores for the translated DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires were obtained using the Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) with a score of 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Moreover, all items in the questionnaires obtained an Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) of 0.88-1.00. The DFKS also has an acceptable internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.72, while the FSCBS has a good internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85. The test-retest reliability shows an acceptable Spearman’s correlation at 0.76 for the DFKS and a strong positive Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.73 for the FSCBS.

The validity of the two questionnaires was acceptable and the test-retest reliability showed a strong positive correlation among the items thereby making the cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaires successful. The Filipino versions of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires accurately measure the knowledge and behavior of individuals with type 2 diabetes, respectively.

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is a chronic metabolic condition that represents a major public health issue worldwide, with Type 2 diabetes comprising 80-90% of all cases1. It is estimated that individuals with diabetes will increase from 451 million in 2021 to 693 million by 2045, with around 4.3 million individuals affected in the Philippines as of 20212,3,4. While insulin therapy is vital for managing diabetes, acceptance among patients is frequently obstructed by concerns about side effects, potential disruptions to their lifestyle, and stigma associated with injections.

The objective of the study was to determine the barriers to insulin therapy among adult patients with Type 2 Diabetes mellitus of the Department of Family and Community Medicine of Quezon City General Hospital.

This is a cross-sectional study carried out between July and September 2024 involving 117 participants with Type 2 diabetes. Information was gathered through self-administered questionnaires consisting of the Insulin Treatment Appraisal Scale (ITAS) and the SCREEM-RES questionnaire.

Majority of the participants (67.06%) were aged between 60 and 65, predominantly female (56%) and unemployed with a monthly family household income of less than 8,000 pesos. ITAS revealed negative perceptions towards insulin treatment, primarily due to fear and perceived loss of control. Family resources among the participants was revealed to be inadequate, as reflected in the SCREEM-RES questionnaire.

Age, education, employment status, household income, high negative attitude towards insulin and inadequate family resources are found to be barriers to initiating insulin. The study highlights the need for improved education to foster a supportive environment for insulin use and emphasizes the importance of involving patients in their treatment decisions for effective diabetes management and better long-term health outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant and growing global health concern. Worldwide, 537 million adults have diabetes and 206 million of them are from the Western Pacific Region1. Local prevalence continues to remain high at 7.5%, with 4,303,899 adult Filipinos suffering from diabetes in 2021. DM significantly contributes to the growing burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) worldwide with about 50% of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) being due to diabetic nephropathy alone. Likewise, 60% of Filipinos on maintenance dialysis have ESRD due to DM and hypertension. The primary care setting is the initial point of contact between healthcare providers and patients with type 2 diabetes, hence, the development of clinical practice guidelines that will provide guidance in caring for patients with stable complications of diabetes. The guideline is the first of 3 that are being developed by the Philippine Academy of Family Physicians for the diagnosis and management of adult patients with type 2 diabetes and stable microvascular complications – nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy.

This guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations on the diagnosis and management of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and early stage CKD and is divided into 5 main sections – Clinical Assessment, Diagnostic Tests, Pharmacologic Treatment, Non-pharmacologic Treatment and Patient Outcomes.

The method of guideline development followed the ADAPTE process. The Technical Working Group identified 19 key questions after consultation with colleagues and patients. Recommendations were adopted from high-quality clinical practice guidelines whenever applicable for most of the key clinical questions. On the other hand, the De Novo method of evidence review was used to answer key clinical questions for which recommendations from reviewed guidelines were not available. A modified GRADEPro was used in assessing the quality of evidence – high, moderate, low or very low. Following external review by a nephrologist, the draft recommendations were sent to the members of the consensus panel. Voting on whether to include or not by the consensus panel was facilitated to determine the strength of each recommendation – strong, moderate or weak.

After reviewing 3 high-quality clinical practice guidelines and the current evidence, the technical working group was able to develop 40 recommendations for the 19 key clinical questions.

BACKGROUND

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients are predisposed to cognitive decline and dementia. The cooccurrence of the two diseases translate to a higher medical cost. Identification of factors contributing to cognitive impairment is warranted.

To determine the predictors of cognitive impairment among Filipino patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

This is a cross-sectional analytical study involving Filipino patients diagnosed with T2DM in the outpatient clinic. A total of 171 patients were included and were screened using AD8-P tool.

A total of 171 adult patients were included and screened for cognitive impairment.19.3% were cognitively impaired, with mean age of 59.6 years old (vs. 55.5 years old, p < 0.029), and two-thirds were female. The mean duration of the patient’s diabetes was 11.2 years. After adjusting for confounders and multi-collinearity, the duration of diabetes was significantly associated with cognitive impairment with odds of developing cognitive impairment increasing as the duration reach 10 years above. Those with T2DM for at least ten years were 2.5 times more likely to develop cognitive impairment, holding the age constant. (OR = 2.5, 95% CI – 1.0 to 5.8, p < 0.043).

19.3% of Filipino patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a tertiary government hospital are cognitively impaired and this can occur even in less than 65 years old. The ten years or longer duration of T2DM increases the risk of developing cognitive impairment by 2.5%.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of mySugr^TM app on diabetes self-management, HbA1c level and its acceptability among app users with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

A prospective, single-arm interventional study in 70 adult Filipino patients with T2DM and HbA1c ≥ 8.0%. Participants used the basic mySugr^TM mobile app for 12 weeks. The Modified Behavior Score Instrument and the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ) pre- and post-intervention measured its impact on diabetes self-management while the Mobile Application rating Scale (MARS) assessed the quality of the app.

There was a significant increased adherence to the diabetes self-care behaviors. DSMQ showed that only 12% of the participants had poor self-care behaviors at week 12 particularly in physical activity and diet. The baseline median HbA1c [9.55% (8.43-11.30)] and estimated HbA1c [8.9% (8.3-10.9)] declined significantly after week 12, [8.0% (8.0-8.43)] and [7.2% (6.5-8.1)] respectively with a very significant p value of (p < 0.00001). About 42% of patients achieved an HbA1c level of ≤7%. MARS confirmed the app’s good quality and acceptability.

Mobile application such as mySugr^TM mobile app can be a viable tool for improved self-care behavior and help in achieving good glycemic control among patients with poorly controlled T2DM even as early as 12 weeks. The app has good quality and acceptability.

BACKGROUND: Chronic illnesses such as Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity have been implicated as risk factors in the development of cognitive impairment (CI), but despite this, definite association between the two conditions in increasing cognitive impairment risk is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and cognitive impairment (CI) in elderly patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted in the outpatient clinics of a private hospital in Manila which included elderly patients with Type 2 diabetes. BMI categories of the subjects were determined using the Asia-Pacific criteria and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment – Philippines (MOCA-P) was administered to subjects who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence of impaired cognition among subjects while risk ratio analysis was used to determine the correlation between BMI and CI. Correlation analysis and linear regression analysis were used to determine the presence of association between cognition (measured by MOCA-P scores) and BMI. For all analysis, a 95% level of significance was used. RESULTS: A total of 109 subjects from the outpatient clinics were included in the study. A high percentage of the study population (90.83%) had CI based on MOCA-P scores. Subjects that belonged to the extremes of BMI- underweight and obese class 2 had higher incidence of CI compared to the other groups. Underweight subjects had 1.103 (95% CI: 1.038 to 1.172) times likelihood of having impaired cognition (p-value 0.0016), while obese 2 subjects had 1.110 (95% CI: 1.040 to 1.184) times likelihood of having impaired cognition (p-value 0.0016). Regression analysis revealed that in subjects with diabetes of less than 10 years, cognition scores were negatively correlated to BMI (p-value 0.0454). Correlation analysis revealed that at the general population level, regardless of the external factors, increasing or decreasing BMI did not have significant effect on cognition scores. CONCLUSION Subjects who belonged to the extremes of BMI-underweight and obese class 2 – had higher incidence of CI compared to the other BMI groups. Among subjects with T2DM duration of less than 10 years, cognition scores tend to be negatively correlated to BMI.
diabetes mellitus, Type 2 ; cognitive impairment ; cognitive dysfunction ; Body Mass Index

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes are vulnerable and highly susceptible to contracting COVID-19. Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) may provide prognostic information in hospitalized patients. It is debatable whether stress hyperglycemia directly leads to poor outcomes, or is simply a marker of increased stress and inflammation.

This study investigates whether high SHR is associated with poor clinical outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and moderate to critical COVID-19 infection. Moreover, this study aims to compare high SHR versus absolute hyperglycemia as a predictor of poor outcomes.

A chart review was conducted on 146 COVID-19 patients with T2DM from March 2020 to December 2021. The area under the receiver operating curve was conducted to categorize SHR into low and high levels. The association of high SHR levels and absolute hyperglycemia with outcomes was analyzed using the regression analysis. Survival analysis was also utilized to allow differences in the time when in-hospital mortality occurred.

Patients with high SHR had a significantly higher proportion of mortality and invasive ventilation compared to those with low SHR. High SHR significantly increased the likelihood of invasive ventilation by 16.49 times and mortality hazards by 5.70 times compared to low SHR. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that those with high SHR had significantly lower survival rates than those with low SHR. In contrast, the survival estimates between those with and without absolute hyperglycemia were not statistically significant.

High SHR (>1.082) was associated with poorer outcomes, increased invasive mechanical ventilatory support and increased mortality.

OBJECTIVES

Pre-impaired glucose tolerance (pre-IGT) is a prediabetes stage characterized by normoglycemia and compensatory hyperinsulinemia due to insulin resistance. Hyperinsulinemia increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, especially, endothelial dysfunction (ED). However, there is paucity of studies on ED with hyperinsulinemia alone, particularly in individuals with pre-IGT. This study aimed to determine the presence of ED using brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) among adult participants with pre-IGT and its correlation with insulin levels and other related clinical parameters.

This is a cross-sectional analytical study. We screened adult patients with risk factors for developing diabetes (first-degree relative with type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, history of gestational diabetes and polycystic ovary syndrome). Brachial artery FMD was performed among participants with pre-IGT and findings were correlated with CVD risk factors using Pearson’s correlation and linear regression.

Of the 23 pre-IGT patients, 5 (21.74%) had decreased FMD values with significant associations with serum insulin and HbA1c. It was further observed that for every 1-unit increase in second-hour serum insulin and in HbA1c, there was a decrease in FMD values by 0.38% and 0.50%, respectively. Serum insulin was elevated, while other biochemical parameters were normal. Moreover, participants with low FMD were older, with higher BMI and had higher HBA1c, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.

As early as the pre-IGT stage, endothelial dysfunction using the FMD test is already present, with red flags on other CVD risk factors already developing.