Background and Objective: The primary determinant for patient referral by general dental practitioners (GDPs) to periodontists differs based on the country of practice. Moreover, previous research has revealed that GDP preferences for managing periodontal patients, actual number of referrals, and the overall decision-making process have evolved over time. Understanding the periodontal referral pattern of Filipino GDPs could help identify factors that promote or inhibit referral to periodontists. These factors may in turn be used as basis for the formulation of periodontal referral guidelines for use by GDPs in the Philippines. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the factors that affect the referral patterns of Filipino GDPs to periodontists, with GDPs practicing in the City of Manila as the representative population. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study design with the use of a self-administered survey was utilized for this study. Participants were 75 licensed dentists practicing in the City of Manila who were members of the Philippine Dental Association-Manila Dental Chapter. The questionnaire collected information on sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, periodontal referral pattern, and the factors considered by the participants when referring patients to a periodontist. Descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage) were used to report the study’s findings. Results: Majority (92%) indicated that they regularly referred patients with periodontal disease to periodontists, with a personal estimate of up to 20 periodontal case referrals monthly by 81.3% of the participants and >20 referrals for 10.7%. The clinical factors considered as most important when referring to a periodontist were the type of periodontal disease (81.3% of the participants), periodontitis severity (74.7%), and the presence of a complex medical history 61.3%). Among the nonclinical factors, the most influential were the following: uncooperative patient (32% of the participants), perceived personal skill (24%), postgraduate training of the periodontist (21.3%), and the patient’s financial capacity (13.3%). Conclusion Multiple factors affect the decision of general dental practitioners in the City of Manila when referring patients to a periodontist. Majority are influenced by clinical factors such as the type and severity of periodontal disease and the systemic condition of the patient. Although considered to a much lesser degree compared to clinical factors, the top nonclinical factors that Manila GDPs base their referral decisions include the assessment that a patient is uncooperative and the perceived adequacy of personal skills in managing periodontal patients.
Human ; periodontal diseases ; referral and consultation ; dentists ; periodontists

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the esthetic outcome of maxillary anterior single implants by comparing the esthetic perception of dental professionals and patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with single implants in the esthetic zone were enrolled in this study. Dentists of four different dental specialties (Three orthodontists, three oral surgeons, three prosthodontists, and three periodontists) evaluated the pink esthetic score (PES)/white esthetic score (WES) for 23 implant-supported single restorations. The satisfactions of the patients on the esthetic outcome of the treatment have been evaluated according to the visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: The mean total PES/WES was 12.26 ± 4.76. The mean PES was 6.45 ± 2.78 and mean WES was 5.80 ± 2.82. There was a statistically significant difference among the different specialties for WES (P<.01) and Total PES/WES (P<.01). Prosthodontists were found to have assigned poorer ratings among the other specialties, while oral surgeons gave the higher ratings than periodontists, orthodontists, and prosthodontists. CONCLUSION: Prosthodontists seemed to be stricter when assessing aesthetic outcome among other specialties. Moreover, a clear correlation existed between dentists' and patients' esthetic perception, thereby providing rationales for involving patients in the treatment plan to achieve higher levels of patient satisfaction.
Dental Implants, Single-Tooth ; Dentists ; Humans ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons ; Orthodontists ; Patient Satisfaction ; Specialization* ; Specialties, Dental ; Visual Analog Scale

Pregnancy induces significant anatomical and physiological changes in the mother. Many pregnant women need dental treatment due to poor oral hygiene related to pregnancy. However, most dentists are reluctant to provide, and most pregnant women are reluctant to receive, dental treatment during pregnancy. Theoretically, maternally administered drugs are transferred to the fetus. Depending on the types of drugs and the stage of pregnancy, the effects of drugs on the mother, as well as the fetus, may vary. Local anesthetics are the most widely used in dental treatment. It is, therefore, important to understand the potential effects of local anesthetics during pregnancy. In this review, we will focus on the maternal and fetal effects of local anesthetics widely used in dental treatment with consideration of the use of local anesthetics during pregnancy.
Anesthetics, Local* ; Dental Care ; Dentists ; Female ; Fetus ; Humans ; Mothers ; Oral Hygiene ; Pregnancy* ; Pregnant Women

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the influences of oral health behaviors, depression, and stress on periodontal disease in pregnant women. METHODS: The participants in this study were 129 pregnant women. Data were collected using questionnaires which included individual characteristics, oral health care behaviors, the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale (CES-D), a global measure of perceived stress, and pregnancy stress. A dentist measured periodontal probing depth and classified stages of periodontal disease according to the Community Periodontal Index (CPI). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression. RESULTS: Periodontal disease had significant correlations with oral health care behaviors (r=-.56, p <.001), perceived stress (r=.44 p <.001), pregnancy stress (r=.37 p <.001), diet (r=-.33, p <.001) and depression (r=.18 p =.046). Factors influencing periodontal disease for these pregnant women were being in the 2nd (β=.27, p <.001) or 3rd trimester (β=.45, p <.001), having a pregnancy induced disease (β=.20, p =.002), performing higher oral health behaviors (β=-.30, p <.001), and having higher perceived stress (β=.17, p =.028). The explanation power of this regression model was 61.6% (F=15.52, p <.001). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicated that periodic assessment of periodontal disease is essential for pregnant women who are in 2nd or 3rd trimester and have pregnancy induced diseases. Enhancing oral health care behaviors and reducing perceived stress are indicated as effective strategies to reduce periodontal disease in pregnant women.
Dentists ; Depression* ; Diet ; Female ; Humans ; Oral Health* ; Periodontal Diseases* ; Periodontal Index ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant Women* ; Stress, Psychological

Antiresorptive drugs (ARDs), such as bisphosphonates or denosumab, that prevent bone resorption are widely used in patients with osteoporosis or with cancer that has metastasized to the bones. Although osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a well-documented complication of ARD use, the benefits ARDs outweigh the complication. Thus, research has focused on finding ways to prevent or reduce the risk of developing ONJ. Dentists, as part of a multi-professional team, have a critical role in preventing ONJ. However, many dentists tend to hesitate to provide dental care to patients with ONJ, or tend to think that it is a problem to be dealt with by oral surgeons. This review gives an overview of ARD-related ONJ and provides the guidelines for dental care in patients taking ARDs to lower the risk of developing ONJ.
Bone Density Conservation Agents ; Bone Resorption ; Denosumab ; Dental Care ; Dentists ; Diphosphonates ; Humans ; Jaw ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons ; Osteonecrosis ; Osteoporosis

Dentists

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a well-known pathological condition in oncology derived from the use of bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab. Many molecular and immunological targets have been introduced for daily use in cancer treatment in recent years; consequently, new cases of ONJ have been reported in association with these drugs, especially if administered with BPs and denosumab. When the drugs are administered alone, ONJ is rarely seen. The objective of our study was to analyze the recent literature relative to the association of ONJ with these new drugs highlighting the pathogenic, clinical and therapeutic aspects. The close collaboration between maxillofacial surgeon, oncologist, dentist, and dental hygienist remains the most important aspect for the prevention, prompt recognition, and treatment of this pathology.
Angiogenesis Modulating Agents ; Cooperative Behavior ; Denosumab ; Dental Hygienists ; Dentists ; Diphosphonates ; Humans ; Immunomodulation ; Immunotherapy ; Jaw ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons ; Oral Manifestations ; Osteonecrosis ; Pathology

PURPOSE: This study tried to find the most significant factors predicting implant prognosis using machine learning methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data used in this study was based on a systematic search of chart files at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital for one year. In this period, oral and maxillofacial surgeons inserted 667 implants in 198 patients after consultation with a prosthodontist. The traditional statistical methods were inappropriate in this study, which analyzed the data of a small sample size to find a factor affecting the prognosis. The machine learning methods were used in this study, since these methods have analyzing power for a small sample size and are able to find a new factor that has been unknown to have an effect on the result. A decision tree model and a support vector machine were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The results identified mesio-distal position of the inserted implant as the most significant factor determining its prognosis. Both of the machine learning methods, the decision tree model and support vector machine, yielded the similar results. CONCLUSION: Dental clinicians should be careful in locating implants in the patient's mouths, especially mesio-distally, to minimize the negative complications against implant survival.
Decision Trees ; Dental Implants ; Dentists ; Humans ; Machine Learning ; Methods ; Mouth ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons ; Pilot Projects ; Prognosis ; Sample Size ; Seoul ; Support Vector Machine

BACKGROUND: The aim of this report is to present a new reference for aesthetic mandible surgery using three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography-based treatment planning for orthognathic surgery which can be implemented in surgical planning and perioperative procedure. METHODS: To make an objective standard for evaluating aesthetic mandibular outline, we make an aesthetic scoring criteria with consideration of asymmetry, broad mandibular border line, and prominent mandibular angle. Two maxillofacial surgeons and two orthodontists rated their aesthetical evaluation from 1 to 5. Experimental group consisting of 47 female and 38 male patients who had rotational orthognathic two-jaw surgery from 2010 to 2011 were chosen according to aesthetic scoring done by two maxillofacial surgeons and two orthodontists. A high aesthetic score (≥16) means the facial contour is symmetric, with no broad and narrow aesthetic mandible frontal profiles. Control A group consisted of ten female and ten male patients who had no orthognathic surgery experience and low aesthetic score (≤10). Control B group consisted of ten female and ten male patients who had no orthognathic surgery experience and had anaesthetic mandibular frontal profile and a high aesthetic score (≥16). The three-dimensional image of the patient was taken from dental cone-beam CT (DCT) scanning (experimental group and control A group: 6 months DCT after surgery, control B group: 1st visit DCT). Each DCT was reformatted to reorient the 3D image using 3D analyzing program (OnDemand3D, cybermed Inc, CA, USA). After selection of 12 landmarks and the construction of reoriented horizontal, vertical, and coronal reference lines, 15 measurements were taken in 3D analysis of frontal mandibular morphology. Afterwards, horizontal and vertical linear measurements and angular measurements, linear ratio were obtained. RESULTS: Mean Go’(Rt)-Me’-Go’(Lt) angular measurement was 100.74 ± 2.14 in female patients and 105.37 ± 3.62 in male patients. These showed significant difference with control A group in both genders. Ratio of Go’(Rt),Go’(Lt)-Me’ length to some linear measurements (ratio of Me’-Cd’RtCd’Lt to Me’-Go’(Rt)Go’(Lt), ratio of Me’-Go’ to Me’-Go’(Rt)Go’(Lt), ratio of Go’(Rt)-Go’(Lt) to Me’-Go’(Rt)Go’(Lt)) showed significant difference with control A group in both genders. CONCLUSION: This study was intended to find some standard measurement of mandible frontal view in 3D analysis of aesthetic patient. So, these potential measurement value may be helpful for orthognathic treatment planning to have more aesthetic and perspective outcomes.
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Male ; Mandible ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons ; Orthodontists ; Orthognathic Surgery

No abstract available.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons*