1.Esophageal perforation: 6 case report.
Young Jin KIM ; Young Ho KO ; Kyoung Jun WON ; Deok Young CHOI ; Dong Suep SOHN ; Dai Yun CHO ; Ki Min YANG
The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1993;26(8):661-663
No abstract available.
Esophageal Perforation*
2.Conservative management of esophageal perforation: Clinical analysis of 14 cases.
Byung Woo BAE ; Hyung Ryul LEE ; Jong Won KIM
The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1993;26(8):633-637
No abstract available.
Esophageal Perforation*
3.Esophageal perforation: clinical analysis of 25 cases-.
Byung Woo BAE ; Hyung Ryul LEE ; Jong Won KIM
The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine 1992;7(2):155-164
No abstract available.
Esophageal Perforation*
4.Intestinal Perforation: A Surgeon's Nightmare Enlightened by Scientific Research.
Annals of Coloproctology 2016;32(6):205-205
No abstract available.
Dreams*
;
Intestinal Perforation*
5.The use of OverStitch™ for the treatment of intestinal perforation, fistulas and leaks.
Thiruvengadam MUNIRAJ ; Harry R ASLANIAN
Gastrointestinal Intervention 2017;6(3):151-156
Gastrointestinal perforations, leaks and fistulas may complicate endoscopic and surgical procedures. Surgical repair is associated with significant morbidity. Therapeutic endoscopic tools and techniques have included the application of tissue sealants, clip closure, and stent placement. Endoscopic suturing is a rapidly evolving minimally invasive technique. The OverStitchTM (Apollo Endosurgery, USA) is currently the only available endoscopic suturing system. Although technically more difficult than clip closure, endoscopic suturing allows closure of larger defects. In some settings, outcomes similar to surgical management with less morbidity may be achieved. This review describes the OverStitchTM endoscopic suturing system and the published literature regarding its use for perforations, leaks and fistulas.
Fistula*
;
Intestinal Perforation*
;
Stents
6.The value of gastropneumography in the diagnosis of acute gastroduodenal perforation
Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Information 2000;(4):31-35
From 1982, The Abdominal Surgery Department of the Hospital 103 had applied gastropneumography to diagnose suspected gastroduodenal perforation in patients without subphrenic sickle-air. Air was pumped through nasogastric tube with a volume of 700 ml to 1000 ml. By this technique, definite diagnosis of perforation was made and the surgery was indicated early. Sensitivity of the technique was 82.6%. This technique should be recommended in medical units, where emergency abdominal operation can be performed early to restrict potential complications.
Peptic Ulcer Perforation
;
Diagnosis
7.Gastropneumography in the diagnosis of suspected acute gastroduodenal perforation.
Journal of Preventive Medicine 2001;11(4):32-37
From 1982, the abdominal surgery department of Hospital No 103 had applied Gastropneumography to diagnose suspecting gastroduodenal perforation patients without subphrenic sickle-air. Volume air was pumped into stomach through nasogastrotube from 700 ml to 1000 ml. The technique gave determined diagnosis of perforation and operating indication early which helped to restrict complication of perforation. The sensitivity of technique was 82.6%. There was no noticeable catastrophe that involved in technique in this study
Peptic Ulcer Perforation
;
Diagnosis
8.Esophageal perforation complicated by balloon dilatation: prevention and conservative treatment.
Young Jung OH ; Kill Woo LEE ; Hyo Keun LIM ; Woo Chul WHANG ; In Wook CHOO ; Sang Hoon BAE
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1991;27(2):193-198
No abstract available.
Dilatation*
;
Esophageal Perforation*
9.Esophageal perforation during endotracheal intubation.
Sung Chul KIM ; Sang Ik KIM ; Sang Joon OH ; Chang Ho KIM
The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1992;25(11):1231-1235
No abstract available.
Esophageal Perforation*
;
Intubation, Intratracheal*
10.Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasal Septal Perforation.
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2006;49(6):586-592
No abstract available.
Diagnosis*
;
Nasal Septal Perforation*
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail