1.Analysis of the development trend of burn discipline from the literature published in Chinese Journal of Burns in 22 years.
Zhuo HUANG ; Yu Lin LI ; Wei Guo XIE ; Mei Jun JIANG ; Lan CHEN ; Mao Mao XI
Chinese Journal of Burns 2022;38(8):759-766
Objective: To analyze the literature published in Chinese Journal of Burns (now Chinese Journal of Burns and Wounds) in the last 22 years, and to explore the development trend of burn discipline. Methods: The relevant clinical and research literature published in Chinese Journal of Burns from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2021 were retrieved through China National Knowledge Infrastructure database. Bibliometrics was used to classify and analyze the literature by research types, involved research fields, and reported causes of injury, and compare them every 3 years according to the year of publication (with literature published in 2021 being included in the last time period). Keywords of all the literature were retrieved, which were corrected and conversed later. CiteSpace 6.1.R2 software was used to visually cluster the included keywords, count high-frequency and high-centrality keywords, and divide the high-frequency keywords by time as before for segment comparison. Results: A total of 4 485 relevant papers were included, with an average of about 204 papers each year. The research types analysis of literature showed that clinical diagnosis and treatment literature had the highest proportion, reaching 65.3% (2 929/4 485), followed by cell experiment and animal experiment literature, accounting for 18.1% (812/4 485) and 13.2% (591/4 485), respectively. The proportion of various research types of the literature in each time period was basically stable. The analysis of the research fields involved in the literature showed that the literature in the field of systemic treatment of burns accounted for the highest proportion, reaching 60.2% (2 699/4 485), followed by the literature in the fields of acute wounds and plastic surgery, accounting for 20.2% (908/4 485) and 7.3% (326/4 485), respectively. The proportion of the literature in the field of systemic treatment of burns decreased from 84.0% (430/512) in 2000-2002 to 40.3% (373/926) in 2018-2021, with a decreasing proportion of 43.7%. While compared with that in 2000-2002, the proportions of literature in the fields of acute wounds, plastic surgery, chronic wounds, and burn rehabilitation were on the rise, with the proportions in 2018-2021 increased by 11.7%, 9.1%, 10.7%, and 5.5%, respectively. In the first 6 time periods, the number of literature in the field of discipline management was few and remained in single digits, but it increased to 49 in 2018-2021. Among the 1 099 literature in the field of systemic treatment of burns with a clear cause of injury, the literature on thermal burns was the most, accounting for 58.5% (643/1 099), followed by the literature on electrical burns and chemical burns, accounting for 19.8% (218/1 099) and 12.6% (138/1 099), respectively. The comparison by time period showed that the proportion of literature reporting thermal burns showed a significant downward trend, while the proportion of literature reporting other causes of injury did not change significantly. A total of 6 822 keywords from 2 236 literature were included for analysis. Visual cluster analysis showed that relevant studies focused on burns, surgical flaps, scars, and wound healing. The top 3 keywords in frequency were burns, wound healing, and surgical flaps, and the top 3 keywords in centrality were burns, scars, and skin transplantation. The comparison by time period showed that the only keyword with a stable frequency in the top 10 ranks was burns; with the passage of time, some keywords such as endotoxin/endotoxins and fibroblasts gradually dropped out of the top 10 ranks, while keywords such as wounds and injuries, surgical flaps, and negative-pressure wound therapy gradually entered the top 10 ranks. Conclusions: Among the literature published in Chinese Journal of Burns during the last 22 years, the literature on systemic treatment of burns and thermal burns has gradually decreased, while the literature on chronic wounds and burn rehabilitation has increased. Surgical flaps, wound healing, and scar prevention and treatment are the current research hot spots in burn discipline.
Bibliometrics
;
Burns, Chemical
;
Burns, Electric/therapy*
;
China
;
Cicatrix
;
Humans
2.Deep Second Degree Burn of Ferrous Chloride in a Worker at a Wastewater Treatment Facility.
Young Woong MO ; Dong Lark LEE ; Hea Kyeong SHIN ; Gyu Yong JUNG
Journal of Korean Burn Society 2018;21(2):63-66
FeCl₂ is often used in stainless steel surface processing, wastewater treatment, or in laboratories. Effects of exposure to FeCl₂ include predominantly systemic side effects that can occur when inhalation or oral intake occurs. However, it is known that skin irritation or burning can be caused by exposure to skin, but there has never been reported a case of deep FeCl₂ burns. We will introduce a case of a patient treated with deep second degree burn due to FeCl₂ exposure. A 27-year-old healthy man came in contact with FeCl₂ on his right wrist. The patient didn't wear any protective clothing, and the clothes were contaminated with FeCl₂ about one hour ago, but the patient was not aware of the danger of exposure. After an hour, the patient felt tingling, so he took off his exposed clothes and washed exposed skin, then came to our hospital. Initially there were mild erosion, erythema, and tingling symptoms. Two days later, eschar began to develop and wound began to deepen. Surgical procedure was not performed and it took 5 weeks for the patient's wound to heal. As a rule, workers using FeCl₂ are required to wear protective clothing. In Korea, companies and laboratories using FeCl₂ are not strictly required the use of protective clothing. Workers handling FeCl₂ should be strictly encouraged to wear protective clothing, if exposed, should be instructed to visit the hospital after a quick washing away.
Adult
;
Burns*
;
Burns, Chemical
;
Clothing
;
Erythema
;
Humans
;
Inhalation
;
Korea
;
Protective Clothing
;
Skin
;
Stainless Steel
;
Waste Water*
;
Wounds and Injuries
;
Wrist
3.Molecular Mechanisms of Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury.
Lin CHEN ; Hai-Fa XIA ; You SHANG ; Shang-Long YAO
Chinese Medical Journal 2018;131(10):1225-1231
ObjectiveMechanical ventilation (MV) has long been used as a life-sustaining approach for several decades. However, researchers realized that MV not only brings benefits to patients but also cause lung injury if used improperly, which is termed as ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). This review aimed to discuss the pathogenesis of VILI and the underlying molecular mechanisms.
Data SourcesThis review was based on articles in the PubMed database up to December 2017 using the following keywords: "ventilator-induced lung injury", "pathogenesis", "mechanism", and "biotrauma".
Study SelectionOriginal articles and reviews pertaining to mechanisms of VILI were included and reviewed.
ResultsThe pathogenesis of VILI was defined gradually, from traditional pathological mechanisms (barotrauma, volutrauma, and atelectrauma) to biotrauma. High airway pressure and transpulmonary pressure or cyclic opening and collapse of alveoli were thought to be the mechanisms of barotraumas, volutrauma, and atelectrauma. In the past two decades, accumulating evidence have addressed the importance of biotrauma during VILI, the molecular mechanism underlying biotrauma included but not limited to proinflammatory cytokines release, reactive oxygen species production, complement activation as well as mechanotransduction.
ConclusionsBarotrauma, volutrauma, atelectrauma, and biotrauma contribute to VILI, and the molecular mechanisms are being clarified gradually. More studies are warranted to figure out how to minimize lung injury induced by MV.
Animals ; Barotrauma ; metabolism ; Humans ; Reactive Oxygen Species ; metabolism ; Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury ; metabolism ; Wounds and Injuries ; metabolism
4.A Case of Acute Renal Failure Caused by Cresol Ingestion.
Hye Suk HAN ; Hag Ei KIM ; Young Ook EUM ; Su In YOON ; Joungho HAN ; Ki Won MOON ; Soon Kil KWON ; Hye Young KIM ; Kyung Sook LEE
Korean Journal of Nephrology 2005;24(2):342-345
Cresol, a commonly used disinfectant, is an extremly toxic material and can cause systemic effects such as respiratory, neurological, gastrointestinal, hepatic and renal damage. Cresol intoxication can be caused by inhalation, cutaneous adsorption or oral ingestion. Cresol denatures and precipitates cellular proteins, thus exer ts their toxic effects directly on all cells. There is only one case of cresol intoxication in Korea, but a case of chemical burn. We report a case of acute renal failure caused by cresol ingestion. A 39-year-old male attempted suicide by ingesting 200 mL of 50% cresol solution. Acute renal failure developed, but he recovered by only supportive care. It was reported that the lethal dose of saponated cresol solution is approximately 60-120 mL and the lethal blood level is 71-190 microgram/mL. The amount of cresol ingested by the patient far exceeded the reported lethal dose. This is the first case of acute renal failure caused by cresol ingestion successfully treated with only supportive care in Korea.
Acute Kidney Injury*
;
Adsorption
;
Adult
;
Burns, Chemical
;
Eating*
;
Humans
;
Inhalation
;
Korea
;
Male
;
Suicide, Attempted
5.Cold Injury.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 1998;41(2):195-203
No abstract available.
Cold Injury*
6.Epidemiological investigation of hospitalized children with burn injuries in a hospital of Fuzhou.
Lin LI ; Renqin LIN ; Le XU ; Qiong PAN ; Jiaxi DAI ; Meiyun JIANG ; Zhaohong CHEN
Chinese Journal of Burns 2016;32(6):351-355
OBJECTIVETo analyze the epidemiological characteristics of hospitalized children with burn injuries in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, so as to provide evidence to complete an adequate, timely, and effective prevention and treatment system of children with burn injuries.
METHODSMedical records of children with burn injuries, aged 14 and under, hospitalized in the Department of Burns from July 2012 to June 2015 were collected. Data of gender and age, location and cause of injury, time of injury, state of injury, admission time after injury, first aid, length of hospital stay, and treatment and so on were recorded. They were divided into 4 age brackets: less than or equal to 1 year old, more than 1 year old and less than or equal to 3 years old, more than 3 years old and less than or equal to 7 years old, more than 7 years old and less than or equal to 14 years old, then gender and cause of injury of children in the 4 age brackets were analyzed. Admission months of the children were divided into spring (March to May), summer (June to August), autumn (September to November) and winter (December to February of the following year), and then the cause of injury of children in each season was analyzed. Severities of male and female children, length of hospital stay of children with different causes of injury were analyzed. Data were processed with chi-square test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
RESULTSOut of 2 608 inpatients with burn injuries, 1 407 children with burn injuries, aged 14 and under, accounting for 53.9%, were admitted in the recent 3 years. The ratio of male to female was 1.6 ∶1.0. Children more than 1 year old and less than or equal to 3 years old ranked the largest number (68.3%, 961/1 407) in the 4 age brackets. There was statistically significant difference in constituent ratios of gender of children among the 4 age brackets (χ(2)=11.00, P=0.012). One thousand three hundred and seventy-two children were burned indoors (97.5%), while 35 children were burned outdoors (2.5%). Scalding with hot fluids was the most common cause of burn (95.0%, 1 337/1 407). There was statistically significant difference in constituent ratios of injury cause of children among the 4 age brackets (χ(2)=107.23, P<0.01). There was statistically significant difference in constituent ratios of injury cause of children more than 7 years old and less than or equal to 14 years old compared with those of the other 3 age brackets (with χ(2) values from 12.88 to 119.85, P values below 0.01). Most burn accidents occurred between 17: 00-20: 59 (33.5%, 472/1 407). Burns were more likely to happen in April to October. July (10.4%, 146/1 407) and August (10.5%, 148/1 407) were the crest-time. Most of the children were burned in summer (35.3%, 496/1 407). There was statistically significant difference in the injury cause of children among each season (χ(2)=14.61, P=0.024). The burn degrees of male and female children were mainly mild or moderate, and there was no statistically significant difference in the severity (Z=-0.39, P>0.05). The trunk was the most involved anatomic site (61.1%, 859/1 407). Most of children were admitted to hospital within 2 hours post burn (79.7%, 1 121/1 407). Majority of children were taken off clothes as first aid on spot or did not receive any treatment. Most of the children were discharged within 2 weeks after admission (80.0%, 1 126/1 407). There was statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay of children with causes of hot liquid scald, flame burn, electric burn, high temperature solid burn, chemical burn (χ(2) =17.33, P=0.002). Most of the children were treated with non-surgical methods, and the majority of the children got better condition or totally recovered and then discharged.
CONCLUSIONSThe majority of hospitalized children with burn injuries in our unit are young boys in preschool period, who were burnt by hot fluid at the time of dinner and bathing at home during summer. So we should make more effort on popularization of prevention about burn.
Adolescent ; Burns ; classification ; epidemiology ; Burns, Chemical ; Burns, Electric ; Child ; Child, Hospitalized ; statistics & numerical data ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Infant ; Inpatients ; Length of Stay ; Male
8.Lung Injury Due to Mechanical Ventilation: from Barotrauma to Biotrauma.
The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine 2001;16(2):89-95
No abstract available.
Barotrauma*
;
Lung Injury*
;
Lung*
;
Respiration, Artificial*
9.Clinical Observation in 1211 Cases of Burn Patients.
Young Ho AHN ; Woo Ik CHOI ; Chan Sang PARK ; Jhun JO ; Boung Dae YOO ; Dong Phil LEE
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 1998;9(2):303-310
We have reviewed 1211 burn patients who had visited our emergency department of Keimyung University Dongsan medical center between April 1995 to March 1997. The following results were obtained; 1) On age and sex distribution, the highest incidence of age group was under 10 year and old in 321 cases(26.5%). Male was affected more frequently than female, the incidence being 847 cases(70.1%) and 364 cases(29.9%). The ratio of male to female was 2.3:1. 2) No monthly and seasonal differences could be recognized. We found winter season having the highest 319 cases(26.3%), followed by autumn, spring and summer. 3) An analysis of causes in burns showed that flame burns were 527 cases(43.1%), scalding burns, 486 cases(40.2%), electrical burns, 96 cases(8.1%) and chemical burns, 48 cases(4.1%). 4) Domestic accidents accounted for 639 cases(52.7%), occupational for 286 cases(23.6%), traffic accidents for 160 cases(13.2%), suicides for 122 cases(10.1%), formentation for 4 cases(0.4%). 5) Most of patients 699 cases(57.7%) were affected with 2nd degree burn in depth, 1st degree for 413 cases(34.1%) and 3rd degree for 99 cases(8.2%). 6) The trunk was the anatomical region most commonly affected followed by upper and lower limbs. 7) 243 cases(20.5%) of all were accompanied by some complications. The main complications were would infection noted in 212 cases(17.5%), pneumonia in 179 cases(14.8%), acute renal failure in 160 cases(13.2), contracture in 155 cases(13.0), urinary tract infection in 24 cases(2.0%), Curling ulcer in 20 cases(1.6%) in order. 8) The over-all mortality rate was 73 cases(6.1%). The mortality rate of the patients with inhalation injury were 33 cases(45.3%). Causes of death were due to sepsis in 54 cases(4.5%), ARDS in 11 cases(0.9%), acute renal failure in 5 cases(0.4%), upper GI bleeding in 2 cases(0.2%), purmonary edema in 1 cases(0.1%).
Accidents, Traffic
;
Acute Kidney Injury
;
Burns*
;
Burns, Chemical
;
Cause of Death
;
Contracture
;
Duodenal Ulcer
;
Edema
;
Emergency Service, Hospital
;
Female
;
Hemorrhage
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Inhalation
;
Lower Extremity
;
Male
;
Mortality
;
Pneumonia
;
Seasons
;
Sepsis
;
Sex Distribution
;
Suicide
;
Urinary Tract Infections
10.Utility of the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) for Predicting Hospital Mortality in Severely Injured Patients.
Sang Hoon LEE ; Joon Min PARK ; Jun Seok PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Dong Wun SHIN ; Woo Chan JEON ; Hyun Jong KIM ; Hoon KIM
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2016;27(2):199-205
PURPOSE: We evaluated the power of the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) for predicting hospital mortality in trauma patients. Then, we compared the REMS with two other scoring systems, the Emergency Trauma Score (EMTRAS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) for predicting prognosis. METHODS: We examined data from a prospectively collected registry in a single trauma center from January 2010 to November 2011. Patients enrolled in the registry were trauma patients who were predicted to have an ISS>15 or who required urgent multiple surgical consultations as soon as possible. Pediatric patients (<18-years-old) who were referred after initial care or death on arrival, and those with injuries due to burns, asphyxia, or drowning were excluded. The study population was divided into two subgroups according to hospital mortality, and the differences in clinical characteristics and calculated scores were examined. The odds ratio (OR) of REMS for predicting In-hospital mortality was calculated and the prognostic power of the three scoring systems for predicting hospital mortality by drawing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was compared. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 44 died during hospitalization. All three prognostic scores were significantly higher in the hospital mortality subgroup. The OR of the REMS for predicting hospital mortality was 1.35 (p<0.001). The areas under the ROC curves of the REMS, EMTRAS, and ISS were 0.815 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.727-0.884), 0.872 (95% CI, 0.793-0.930), and 0.693 (95% CI, 0.595-0.780), respectively. The area under the ROC curve of the REMS was not different from that of the EMTRAS or ISS. CONCLUSION: The REMS showed good prognostic power for predicting hospital mortality in severely injured patients. Consecutive prospective studies are warranted to determine the utility of this scoring system for trauma patients.
Asphyxia
;
Burns
;
Drowning
;
Emergencies*
;
Emergency Medicine*
;
Hospital Mortality*
;
Hospitalization
;
Humans
;
Injury Severity Score
;
Mortality
;
Odds Ratio
;
Prognosis
;
Prospective Studies
;
Referral and Consultation
;
ROC Curve
;
Trauma Centers
;
Trauma Severity Indices
;
Triage
;
Wounds and Injuries