1.The intravenously administered palonosetron does not affect the spinal anesthesia.
Myoung Hun KIM ; Seunghee KI ; Kwangrae CHO ; Wonjin LEE ; Sang Min SIN
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2013;65(6 Suppl):S51-S52
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
2.Paroxysmal pain during spinal anesthesia.
Cheon Hee PARK ; Hong Chan PARK ; Yong Seok LIM ; Dae Il PARK ; Hyung Jin KIM
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2014;67(Suppl):S56-S57
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
3.Paroxysmal pain during spinal anesthesia.
Cheon Hee PARK ; Hong Chan PARK ; Yong Seok LIM ; Dae Il PARK ; Hyung Jin KIM
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2014;67(Suppl):S56-S57
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
4.Predictive factors for a difficult spinal anesthesia: a prospective study
Ronquillo Maria Paz ; Lim Lucille
Philippine Journal of Anesthesiology 2008;20(2):39-45
To determine whether there is any combination of patient characteristics that would be useful in predicting a difficult neuraxial block.
Human
;
ANESTHESIA, SPINAL
;
SPINAL PUNCTURE
;
ANESTHESIA
5.A cardiovascular collapse following vigorous cough during spinal anesthesia.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2013;65(6 Suppl):S49-S50
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
;
Cough*
6.Prediction of hypotension in spinal anesthesia.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2013;65(4):291-292
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
;
Hypotension*
7.A Case of Intrinsic Spinal Cord Lesions Complicating Epidural Anesthesia.
Joon Sung AHN ; Sang Jin KIM ; Eung Gyu KIM
Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 2006;24(2):181-183
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Epidural*
;
Spinal Cord*
8.The Infiniti Plus ultrasound needle guidance system improves needle visualization during the placement of spinal anesthesia.
Hesham ELSHARKAWY ; Rovnat BABAZADE ; Sree KOLLI ; Hari KALAGARA ; Mounir L SOLIMAN
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2016;69(4):417-419
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
;
Needles*
;
Ultrasonography*
9.Minor Factors Influencint to the Sensory Blockade Level of Spinal Anesthesia at the L2, 3 Interspace.
Tae Hyun LEE ; Woon Seok ROH ; Bong Il KIM ; Jin Woong PARK
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1996;30(3):321-326
BACKGROUND: Many factors affecting the spread of spinal anesthesia have been investigated. But L3-4 or L4-5 interspace was choosen which was known as the site of buffering, in their study. We investigated the effect of some of these factors on sensory blockade level by using L2-3 interspace. METHODS: Eightyfive patients, ASA physical status I - Il, were involved in our study. Sensory blockade level was checked with pinprick test at 10 minutes and 30 minutes. The effect of age, sex, height, weight, CSF pressure and pressure difference generated when full flexed and non-full flexed lateral position on sensory blockade level was studied whereas other factors such as puncture technique, dosage and concentration of drug and patients position after injection, were kept constant under the same condition. And also studied the effect of degree of flexion at injection on the sensory blockade level. RESULTS: Height and CSF pressure were correlated with sensory blockade level at 10 minutes after injection(R2=0.14, P<0.01). Only height was correlated with sensory blockade level at 30 minutes after injection(R2=0.09, P<0.0l). CONCLUSIONS: Only height was correlated with sensory blokade level at 30 minutes. So, height might be considered as the most impressive minor factor affecting the extent of sensory blockade level.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
;
Humans
;
Punctures
10.Effect of Loss of Epidural Negative Pressure on Spinal Sensory Blokade Level of Spinal Anesthesia.
Bong Il KIM ; Woon Seok RHO ; Kun Hee LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1997;33(5):908-911
BACKGROUND: We postulated that loss of epidural negative pressure might affect on the sensory blockade level of spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Thirty nine patients were involved in our study; group 1, spinal anesthsia with 23G spinal needle (n=20): group 2, spinal anesthesia with 27G spinal needle through the 18G Weiss epidural needle (n=19). Sensory blockade level was checked by pinprick test at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 60 and 90 minutes after spinal anesthesia. RESULTS: There was no difference of sensory blockade level between group 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: From above result, there was no evidence of loss of epidural negative pressure affecting on the spinal sensory blockade level.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
;
Humans
;
Needles
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail