1.Clinical profile, treatment strategies, and outcomes of Filipino adults with brugada pattern electrocardiogram and syndrome in a tertiary care hospital in Manila, Philippines.
Niñ ; a Carissa Alegado-Aseniero ; Vince Ryan Muñ ; oz ; Emily Mae Yap ; Eden Gabriel ; Michael Joseph Agbayani
Philippine Journal of Cardiology 2023;51(2):50-55
BACKGROUND
Brugada syndrome is an inheritable syndrome that carries an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. This study aims to delineate the natural history, clinical and electrophysiologic profile, treatment strategies, and outcomes of patients with Brugada pattern electrocardiogram (ECG) and Brugada syndrome in a tertiary care hospital in the Philippines.
METHODOLOGYThis is a retrospective observational study of patients diagnosed with Brugada pattern ECG and Brugada syndrome admitted in a single center from 2004 to 2019.
RESULTSTwenty-three patients were included in the study. All patients were male. In both groups, the majority were nonsmokers (n = 13) and nonalcoholic beverage drinker (n = 14). In patients with Brugada pattern ECG, all presented as an incidental finding (n = 10; P < 0.001), whereas in Brugada syndrome, six patients presented with out-of-hospital resuscitated cardiac arrest (46.15%, P = 0.019). There were only three patients with a family history of sudden cardiac death. All patients had normal ejection fraction and sinus rhythm. Twenty-one patients had ST elevation (91.30%). Fourteen patients had spontaneous type 1 Brugada pattern ECG, whereas the rest were inducible to type 1 after flecainide test. Seven patients underwent implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation before discharge; one patient died at the time of diagnosis, and one had recurrent admission for arrhythmia. No single patient received medical management.
CONCLUSIONClinical profile, ECG findings, and outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups of patients except for the clinical presentation upon diagnosis. Treatment strategies were guideline-directed.
Human ; Male ; Brugada Syndrome
2.Predictors of in-hospital and short-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic aneurysm and aortic syndrome: A single-center experience
Niñ ; a Carissa L. Alegado-Aseniero ; Rowena Ona ; Jeffrey Mendoza
Philippine Journal of Cardiology 2024;52(2):23-31
BACKGROUND
Endovascular technique has replaced open repair as primary treatment for different aortic disease indications and was associated with low perioperative mortality and acceptable short-, mid-, and long-term survival. Locally, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was not widely practiced until year 2017. This study aims to determine the predictors of in-hospital and short-term outcomes of patients who underwent TEVAR for aortic aneurysm and aortic syndrome in a single center and how it compares with local and international data.
METHODSThis study is a retrospective analysis of 52 adult patients who underwent TEVAR for the treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic syndrome. Demographic and clinical data, diagnostic imaging, and procedural details were obtained via inpatient charts at the medical records section and hospital system database archiving. Outcomes at 30 days and 1 year postprocedure were obtained through telephone follow-up after attaining verbal consent.
Gathered data were analyzed as to association of different variables with or without the presence of complications. Outcomes reported included in-hospital mortality rate, presence of major adverse events (MAEs), 30-day and 1-year survival rates, and rate of freedom from reintervention.
RESULTSThe overall in-hospital mortality was 7.69% (n = 4/52), and complication rate was 32% (n = 20/52), with a survival rate of 92.31% and 87.76% at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. The rates of overall freedom from reintervention were 83.33% and 100% at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. The independent predictors for in-hospital mortality and development of MAEs were increasing weight (odds ratio [OR], 1.0588; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.003–1.208), preexisting chronic kidney disease (OR, 10.33; 95% CI, 1.1069–96.462), and TEVAR with debranching done as a single procedure (OR, 3.6667; 95% CI, 1.1154–12.054), whereas an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 49.05 ± 19.25 (OR, 0.9402; 95% CI, 0.9019–0.9801) and TEVAR with debranching done as a staged procedure (OR, 0.1624; 95% CI, 0.0321–0.8225) statistically decrease the risk for development of in-hospital mortality and MAEs (P = 0.001 and P = 0.028, respectively).
CONCLUSIONIn this single-center study, indications for TEVAR were fusiform and saccular aneurysm, high-risk intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer, complicated acute type B dissection, chronic complicated type B dissection with high-risk feature, and aortic rupture. The outcome of this study shows comparable results with other international studies with an acceptable in-hospital mortality rate, complication rate, short-term survival rate, and rate freedom from reintervention at 30 days and 1 year. Increasing weight, preexisting chronic kidney disease, and TEVAR with debranching done as a single setting are independent predictors for developing in-hospital mortality and MAEs, whereas a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate and TEVAR with debranching done as a staged procedure decrease the risk; hence, careful planning and scheduling of procedure among elective and amenable cases could further reduce complication rates of future TEVAR procedures.
Human ; Aortic Aneurysm ; Aortic Diseases ; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair