2.Influence of metabolic syndrome and its components on the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer
Huan CHEN ; Ting LI ; Zijie WANG ; Zhangqiong WANG ; Gang LUO ; Mingming DENG
Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2020;36(12):2788-2794
ObjectiveTo investigate the association of metabolic syndrome (MS) and its components with the overall survival of pancreatic cancer (PC) patients who do not receive antitumor therapy. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for the data of patients who were diagnosed with PC in The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from August 2013 to November 2018. Related data were collected, including age, sex, body weight, body height, body mass index (BMI), smoking, drinking, medical history of chronic pancreatitis, medical history of biliary tract diseases and gastritis, medical history of chronic hepatitis B/C, medical history of other tumors, presence or absence of PC in first-grade relatives, blood glucose, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), MS, and TNM stage. The log-rank test was used for comparison of survival curves between groups, and the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the influencing factors for survival. ResultsA total 269 PC patients were enrolled in this study, with an average survival time of 3 months. The survival analysis showed no significant difference in survival time between the patients with MS and those without MS (P=0.754). There was no significant difference in median survival time between the patients with hypertension, high TG, high HDL-C, or abnormal BMI and those without such abnormality (all P>0.05). There was a significant difference in median survival time between the patients with hyperglycemia and those without hyperglycemia (hazard ratio [HR]=1.322, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.985-1.775, P=0.028), and the multivariate Cox regression analysis achieved consistent results (HR=1481, 95% CI: 1.043-2.104, P=0.028). The analysis of the influencing factors for survival time in patients with stage Ⅳ PC showed that the patients with hyperglycemia had a significant reduction in median survival time (HR=1.524, 95%CI: 1.046-2.218, P=0004). ConclusionMS is not an influencing factor for the survival of PC patients, but hyperglycemia is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in PC patients, especially in those with advanced PC.
3.Detection of proximal serrated polyps:a single-center retrospective analysis
Qingyun LI ; Peng XIAO ; Tingsheng LING ; Yangyang SUN ; Lijun LUO ; Rong LIANG ; Zijie DENG ; Waikay SETO
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2019;36(2):86-90
Objective To investigate the prevalence and endoscopic detection rate of proximal serrated polyps and to screen the risk factors. Methods The data of 9010 colonoscopies performed by 22 endoscopists between September 2016 and September 2017 were reviewed. The adenoma detection rate (ADR) and proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSDR) were calculated, and the correlation between ADR and PSDR was estimated by Pearson correlation coefficients. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze PSDR among endoscopists. Results For all subjects, the mean ADR was 30. 07% ( ranged from 20. 00% to 40. 78%) and mean PSDR was 4. 70% ( ranged from 1. 52% to 9. 28%) . PSDR of males was 1. 38 times of that of females ( OR=1. 38, 95%CI:1. 13-1. 69, P<0. 01) . For 3560 cases ( 39. 51%) of 50 years and older subjects, the mean ADR was 45. 01% ( 28. 99%-57. 78%) and mean PSDR was 6. 08%(2. 07%-10. 56%). PSDR was moderately correlated with ADR (r=0. 48, P=0. 02). PSDR of males was 1. 36 times of that of females (OR=1. 36, 95%CI: 1. 04-1. 80, P=0. 03). Endoscopist was a significant risk factor for detection of proximal serrated polyps ( P<0. 01) . Compared with endoscopist with the highest PSDR, odds ratio of other endoscopists ranged from 0. 16 (95%CI:0. 06-0. 40, P<0. 01) to 0. 83 (95%CI:0. 53-1. 32, P=0. 44) . Conclusion Proximal serrated polyps are more common in males, who are over 50 years old. The PSDR is highly variable and dependent on endoscopists. It is possible that a certain proportion of proximal serrated polyps are missed during colonoscopy.